• Welcome to ClassicBroncos! - You are currently viewing the forums as a GUEST. To take advantage of all the site features, please take a moment to register. It's fast, simple and absolutely free. So please join our community today!
    If you have problems registering or can't log into your account, please contact Admin.

Best way to 3 link a front dana 60

Silverhorse

Bronco Guru
Joined
Aug 25, 2006
Messages
1,029
Loc.
Pensacola
I'll be going 1 ton before long on my trail rig. I'm keeping the stock type coil and trac bar. I would like to see what others have done to install the 60. I won't be using C's wedges. I have thought about using Cage arms, Rubicon Express long arms etc... Mine is 1990 dana 60 FYI.
 
Last edited:

DanWheeler

Bronco Guru
Joined
Nov 8, 2005
Messages
2,549
Loc.
Kirkland, WA
I'll be going 1 ton before long on my trail rig. I'm keeping the stock type coil and trac bar. I would like to see what others have done to install the 60. I won't be using C's wedges. Cage arms, Rubicon Express long arms etc... Mine is 1990 dana 60 FYI.

Me too - subscribed!
 

DanWheeler

Bronco Guru
Joined
Nov 8, 2005
Messages
2,549
Loc.
Kirkland, WA
One thing i've been tossing around in my head is copying the Jeep 5-link front design. Four parallel, equal length (I think) control arms and a trackbar.

I know it works - i have to watch my friend's jeeps crawl over everything with ease even with open fronts and then there's me, bouncing around being all tippy and unstable.
 

ken75ranger

Bronco Guru
Joined
Jan 27, 2002
Messages
5,069
Loc.
Troy, NY
Silverhorse,
Since your going to be building-welding for the 3 link anyway you should consider moving the lower trac bar mount.
A longer and flatter tracbar will keep the axle centered better through the range of motion.
If your planning on heim or chevy crossover steering. It really helps your steering geometry if you get your tracbar over closer to the knuckle.
Danwheeler
That's how my rig is setup. If the arms are long you won't get too much binding. With the right design you could take off an upper arm for a weekend of hard wheeling then put it back for the saftely aspect of 2 upper links for regular DD duties.
 
OP
OP
Silverhorse

Silverhorse

Bronco Guru
Joined
Aug 25, 2006
Messages
1,029
Loc.
Pensacola
Thanks for posting guys. I do like the jeep 5 link. I have been interested in it since Greasball did his in Bronco Driver. Wish we could get more pics of it!
Ken, could you post pics of your set-up from in front of the front axle? Thanks
 

DanWheeler

Bronco Guru
Joined
Nov 8, 2005
Messages
2,549
Loc.
Kirkland, WA
Silverhorse,
Since your going to be building-welding for the 3 link anyway you should consider moving the lower trac bar mount.

do you just mean raising the lower mount or something else?

With the right design you could take off an upper arm for a weekend of hard wheeling then put it back for the saftely aspect of 2 upper links for regular DD duties.

Are you saying a 5-link wont flex as well as a 5-link with a missing arm? (3 link w/ panhard)
 

carter2772

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Oct 21, 2008
Messages
1,560
Loc.
Camano Island, Wa
I installed Cage brackets on my D 60 front. I have not used it yet, but have been told they are they way to go. I have JD long arms.
 

DanWheeler

Bronco Guru
Joined
Nov 8, 2005
Messages
2,549
Loc.
Kirkland, WA

ah, i think i remember that thread.

I think you will find yourself replacing those 4 bushings constantly if you take it offroad often.

All the force the C-bushings used to handle is now put onto those 4 little bushings. I think they will egg themselves out after a few trips.

I see a guy out on the trail every once and a while who has the JD arms welded to his D60. He says he replaces bushings every 2-3 trips.
 

kb6677

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Jan 19, 2004
Messages
2,175
FWIW- When we did the beater rig, we ran into a wheelbase issue if we stretched the front out to clear a triangulated 4 link(read tooooo long w/o rear steer), the oil pan, ds. and some other issues compounded the 4link problem. So, did some talking to comp guys who have built much stuff over the years and settled on the 3 link instead of the parallel 4link which we could have done. The 3link when set up properly is a little more "usable" in their opinion. Here are some pics of mine- "Ylink" is on the driver side, trac. bar runs from d.s. frame down to the tube on the pas. side.
Brackets available from ballistic or poly, 1.25 heims as well, we did upgrade the top link to a 7/8 chromo heim after my buddy had a 3/4 heim separate on him this summer resulting in major problems.........
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1728_1_1.JPG
    IMG_1728_1_1.JPG
    103.6 KB · Views: 150
  • IMG_2780_2_3.JPG
    IMG_2780_2_3.JPG
    174.4 KB · Views: 128
  • IMG_2781_1_3.JPG
    IMG_2781_1_3.JPG
    169.4 KB · Views: 126
Last edited:

DanWheeler

Bronco Guru
Joined
Nov 8, 2005
Messages
2,549
Loc.
Kirkland, WA
FWIW- When we did the beater rig, we ran into a wheelbase issue if we stretched the front out to clear a 4 link(read tooooo long w/o rear steer), the oil pan, ds. and so other issues compounded the 4link problem. So, did some talking to comp guys who have built much stuff over the years and settled on the 3 link instead of the parallel 4link which we could have done. The 3link when set up properly is a little more "usable" in their opinion. Here are some pics of mine- "Ylink" is on the driver side, trac. bar runs from d.s. frame down to the tube on the pas. side.
Brackets available from ballistic or poly, 1.25 heims as well, we did upgrade the top link to a 7/8 chromo heim after my buddy had a 3/4 heim separate on him this summer resulting in major problems.........

wow I would have never though to weld a brace between the lower and upper part of the Y-arm. That kind of makes it pointless to use heims for the upper and lower connection points doesn't it?

If you have that part of the Y-arm welded, why not just weld the arms directly to the axle?

The advantage of having joints on both ends (at the axle and saddle) is that it gives you the ability to adjust caster.

I keep forgetting there are trusses readily available for Dana 60 axles. That makes it a much easier decision to go with the single Y-arm on the driver's side. My main concern with that configuration is the axle tubes slipping.

Essentially, a Y-arm config is the same as using 1 wristed arm except its actually a little stiffer because your stiff side has heims instead of a c-bushing. I've always heard mixed things about a wristed arm setup but I've never heard anyone complain that it doesn't flex well.
 

DanWheeler

Bronco Guru
Joined
Nov 8, 2005
Messages
2,549
Loc.
Kirkland, WA
FWIW- When we did the beater rig, we ran into a wheelbase issue if we stretched the front out to clear a triangulated 4 link(read tooooo long w/o rear steer), the oil pan, ds. and some other issues compounded the 4link problem. So, did some talking to comp guys who have built much stuff over the years and settled on the 3 link instead of the parallel 4link which we could have done. The 3link when set up properly is a little more "usable" in their opinion. Here are some pics of mine- "Ylink" is on the driver side, trac. bar runs from d.s. frame down to the tube on the pas. side.
Brackets available from ballistic or poly, 1.25 heims as well, we did upgrade the top link to a 7/8 chromo heim after my buddy had a 3/4 heim separate on him this summer resulting in major problems.........

btw - looks awesome - do you shock/coilover towers connect to each other across the engine bay? what are those, air shocks?
 

kb6677

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Jan 19, 2004
Messages
2,175
wow I would have never though to weld a brace between the lower and upper part of the Y-arm. That kind of makes it pointless to use heims for the upper and lower connection points doesn't it?

If you have that part of the Y-arm welded, why not just weld the arms directly to the axle?

The advantage of having joints on both ends (at the axle and saddle) is that it gives you the ability to adjust caster.

I keep forgetting there are trusses readily available for Dana 60 axles. That makes it a much easier decision to go with the single Y-arm on the driver's side. My main concern with that configuration is the axle tubes slipping.

Essentially, a Y-arm config is the same as using 1 wristed arm except its actually a little stiffer because your stiff side has heims instead of a c-bushing. I've always heard mixed things about a wristed arm setup but I've never heard anyone complain that it doesn't flex well.

The reason for the brace between the top and bottom is to eliminate the front axle output(d.s. attachment) moving upon droop- the parallel links even on one side allows the pinion output to move during droop resulting in drive shaft issues. Yes, it does work like radius arms, key word-"works" I will pass on your idea of welding the arms to the tube-thanks
 

kb6677

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Jan 19, 2004
Messages
2,175
btw - looks awesome - do you shock/coilover towers connect to each other across the engine bay? what are those, air shocks?

Thanks, yes, the towers are connected-I will take a pic tomorrow of the brace. The shocks are Fox 2.5" 14" travel air shocks.
 

DanWheeler

Bronco Guru
Joined
Nov 8, 2005
Messages
2,549
Loc.
Kirkland, WA
The reason for the brace between the top and bottom is to eliminate the front axle output(d.s. attachment) moving upon droop- the parallel links even on one side allows the pinion output to move during droop resulting in drive shaft issues. Yes, it does work like radius arms, key word-"works" I will pass on your idea of welding the arms to the tube-thanks

ok, i think we are talking about different things. The brace I'm talking about is the short 5-6" piece of tube welded between the Y part of your upper and lower links on the driver's side.

You bring up a good point about pinion angle with a parallel 4 link setup w/ panhard. With a solid arm on one side, the pinion is always pointed straight at the transfer case regardless of axle articulation as the axle travels along an arc. With a 5-link, your pinion angle will likely remain the same causing driveshaft issues like you mentioned.
 

DanWheeler

Bronco Guru
Joined
Nov 8, 2005
Messages
2,549
Loc.
Kirkland, WA
I will pass on your idea of welding the arms to the tube-thanks

you wouldn't want to actually weld the driver's side arm directly to the axle because then you wouldn't be able to remove it but you could build something that attaches with bolts instead of heims.

I still think it makes more sense to use a saddle on the lower arm to connect the upper part of the Y link w/ heims. Gives you caster adjustability.

Can you ask your fabricators why they welded the upper and lower part of the Y link?
 
Top