Bronco Hut    

   Ford Bronco Parts - Classic Vintage Early Bronco Parts   Toms Bronco Parts   BC Broncos
 Message Forum
 Photo Gallery
 Event Calendar
 Book Reviews
 Bronco Wallpaper
 Bronco FAQ
 Link Back to CB!
 600+ Bronco Links!
Search all Bronco Links
Buy / Sell
 Classifieds / Want Ads
 Vendor Forum
James Duff
Rust Bullet
Sexton Offroad
Bronco Tech
Recent Tech Articles
 •Holley Carb Tips
 •Aussie Locker
 •C6 203 205 Doubler
 •4 Link
 •Clutch Replacement
 •Early Turn Signals
 •C4 Improvements
 •Threaded Dipstick
 •NV3550 5 spd
     More Tech...
Ford Bronco Parts - Classic Vintage Early Bronco Parts

Welcome to the Forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a GUEST which limits your access to viewing only. To take advantage of all the forum features please take a moment to register. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact the admin. If you've lost your password click here.

Go Back Forums > Archives > Bronco Chat - Archives

Thread Tools
Old 04/29/10, 10:32 AM   #1
grox's Avatar
Broomfield, CO
Joined: Apr 10
Posts: 5
Fuel efficient engine swaps???

New guy here... and I might get kicked out for asking this one but, anyone have info on switching to a modern, more fuel efficient motor? Maybe a toyota 22R 4 cylinder? Diesel? Just curious.

I'm considering buying a 71 Bronco for restoration. It's been about 30 years sense my last one (Orange 73). But, I have a long commute, and a long drive to most camping spots, so comfort and milage are important.


grox is offline  
Old 04/29/10, 10:51 AM   #2
Sr. Member
ochretoe's Avatar
Joined: Feb 05
Posts: 802
There have been several diesel swaps. I have not heard of anything smaller than the 170 or 200 6 cyl. that were stock in some Broncos. If I could find one of 4 cyl. diesels in the Egyptian military Jeeps I would try it. Anyway, my Bronco is already a duel fuel rig. It burns gas and oil.

Bronco's, Kids and Mountain Curs... What a mix.
MStark...You are missed.
ochretoe is offline  
Old 04/29/10, 11:11 AM   #3
Bronco Guru
trailpsycho's Avatar
Joined: Dec 03
Posts: 4,815
The Cummins 4bt (diesel) is a swap that has been done quite a few times and is fairly well documented in the archives.

Most people go with a 5.0 or 351W setup with EFI using early 90s Mustang electronics.

The 22RE wouldnt get you out of the parking lot. A Bronco weighs in at about 4-4.5K lbs, so the Toyota motor while a good motor for its breed, will not be very good one for the Bronco.

Another swap that isnt super common, but is supposed to be pretty effective is an inline 300 six (Ford) takes a little shoe-horning to fit, but is supposed to provide great torque and be fairly efficient on fuel.

You can try doing a search to see if any of the other engine ideas you ahve have been discussed. Mostly people here like to keep it Ford, or at least, definitely not Chevy. I have also heard of an Isuzu diesel being used, but never saw photos or any other info.

Frame-up...Explorer 5.0 EFI, NV4500 and D20 (TLG and HD OS), Yukon alloys (w/ SJ) F & R (31 spl), ARBs and 4.88s. F250 h-boost w/Lincoln MC and 4W discs riding on 5.5" Deavers, Cage arms, hoops and shocks. Full Line-X inside, underneath and upside down, custom cage, 35" MTZ on black Eagle alloys.
trailpsycho is offline  
Old 04/29/10, 11:46 AM   #4
grox's Avatar
Broomfield, CO
Joined: Apr 10
Posts: 5
Thanks for the info. I didn't realize these old Bronco's were so heavy. I wonder if there would be any advantages to a 3.8L Buick V6?
grox is offline  
Old 04/29/10, 11:52 AM   #5
Grease Monkey
blubuckaroo's Avatar
I factory ordered it

Ridgefield WA
Joined: Jun 07
Posts: 9,544

My Gallery
In '86 Ford Ranger was available with a turbo Perkins Diesel. 86 HP 1nd 134 ft lbs torque. Pretty puny but I've wondered why someone with a puny I6 hasn't retrofitted one. It should pull a light Bronco pretty well.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg turbodiesel-2.jpg (40.5 KB, 61 views)

'77 Ranger/cut F&R/PS/PB/Vintage Air/2" suspension lift/1" body lift/T tie rod conversion/33-1050-15 BFG K02 tires/ 302/ Edelbrock 500 CFM 4 bbl/Aero Tanks/ Hooker Headers/ dual ex/ NV3550/ B&M shifter/ JB FabTwin Sticks/ 4.11s/rear posi.
blubuckaroo is offline  
Old 04/29/10, 12:00 PM   #6
av bronco
Bronco Guru
av bronco's Avatar
If it aint broke then fix it till it is.

Palmdale CA
Joined: Mar 08
Posts: 1,742

My Gallery
Ive often wonderd how a fuel injected turbo 170 six would do.

68 Sport-automatic undercarrage lubricaton system, anti stop rear brakes,flow thru fresh air ventlation system.
av bronco is offline  
Old 04/29/10, 12:01 PM   #7
Sr. Member
Ranchtruck's Avatar
Joined: Feb 08
Posts: 761

My Gallery
Honestly the 22re was a garbage motor as far as power and efficiency was concerned. Reliable yes, but that only gets you so far. They had a hard time moving the relatively light toyotas around. The 3rz 2.7l 4cyl they came out with in the tacomas is way better. Twice the valves, better head design, and a bit more displacement.

One swap that's always tempted me is a 3.2l SHO taurus motor from the early 90's. A Ranger 3.0l 5spd should bolt up to it, and it would be a fun motor.

Look for high torque output ratings low in the RPM range, that will get you the best economy. High low end torque, medium displacement will get you the best millage.

Turbo diesels are great, but spendy depending on what you're looking for. Gas milage gains may take a while to pay back for the intial investment.
Ranchtruck is offline  
Old 04/29/10, 12:13 PM   #8
Bronco Guru
g8rb8t's Avatar
Joined: Feb 08
eBay: G8RB8T
Posts: 1,365

My Gallery
Here's some pics of a PowerStroke Diesel Bronco from SuperCelebration this year.

'74 Stocker (302, C4)
Binco Build Thread
g8rb8t is offline  
Old 04/29/10, 12:35 PM   #9
sprdv1's Avatar
Guess you better call the Whaaaambulance

Lees Summit-Missouri
Joined: Mar 07
Posts: 64,284

My Gallery
Welcome to the site.. Cummins 4bt (diesel)

sprdv1 is offline  
Old 04/29/10, 12:35 PM   #10
73stallion's Avatar
Don't look at me in that tone of voice!

Eugene, OR
Joined: Mar 04
Posts: 16,787

My Gallery
Originally Posted by av bronco View Post
Ive often wonderd how a fuel injected turbo 170 six would do.
it's been done, but not fuel injected. a member of LEBC has a 170 or 200 with a turbo on it, sucker moves!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSCF0282.JPG (140.0 KB, 112 views)
File Type: jpg DSCF0283.JPG (121.0 KB, 96 views)
73stallion is offline  
Old 04/29/10, 12:40 PM   #11
Bronco Guru

Thatcher, AZ
Joined: May 03
Posts: 24,283
Fuel efficient vs cost efficient is a main reason there just are not many engines out there that will increase the mileage all that much and the ones that do will cost you quite a bit more than it may actually save you.
As others have said those smaller motors you think are more efficient will not be in a bronco. areo dynamics is a major issue with broncos and fuel mileage. Best bet in my book is keep it relatively stock height 302 built to meet your driving needs and tuned properly EFI might help slightly, gearing matched to your driving needs and tire size and you'll pull about all the mileage you can get. You should be able to easily get into the mid to high teens for mileage.

73 Ranger 2 1/2 lift 302 TFS heads NP435,PS,PDB, tierod over, 33x10.50x15 BFG M/T
71 Sport 63,000 miles all orginal except for cut fenders 302 3sp 4.11's D44/BBTrac lok rear
broncnaz is offline  
Old 04/29/10, 12:55 PM   #12
Total hack
Broncobowsher's Avatar
Adapt and overcome

Maricopa, AZ
Joined: Jun 02
Posts: 28,060
The thing is with fuel economy and Broncos, it isn't the engine. The Bronco itself is the problem. It has absolutely nothing aerodynamic about it. It would do better in a wind tunnel test if you put it in there backwards. So no matter what you are fighting the wind.

Now add in weight. You need a fair amount of power to get 2(+) tons moving. The 170 was just over 100 HP new and even then it was lacking to the point the standard gears were 4.10 and 4.56 optional. The gears were not there to make it awasome offroad, they were there to get this thing moving due to lack of power and heavy weight.

For the most part there is little you can do about the drag. The 2-box design has you trapped. The wagon top is probably the most aerodynamic. No lift, skinny tires, air dam under the front bumper all help. Just about any of our normal offroad modifications is the wrong direction.

I know of the excelent reputation of the GM 3.8 V6 for economy in cars. Take that car get up to 75 MPH and slip it in nuetral and see how far you coast. It is a slippery little thing. Try the same thing in the Bronco, it will feel like you are riding the brakes. That is the drag killing you.

The 4BT is probably the best at making the amount of power needed to fight the drag on the least amount of fuel.

Any gas engine with "turbo" makes horrible economy while under boost. Heavy vehicle will always take boost to get moving, drag will keep it in boost at cruise. I grew up with the 80's turbo cars. They got great power and highway economy. Thing is they had to stay out of the turbo when on the highway to get that economy. Play around a little and keep up the boost, A big V8 started looking a lot better and didn't need that premium fuel either.

If you need economy, you need another vehicle.

"She's built like a steakhouse but she handles like a bistro"-Zapp Brannigan
“How hard can it be?”-Clarksonius 4th century BC.
Full throttle, it either solves the problem or ends the suspense.
Broncobowsher is offline  
Old 04/29/10, 01:10 PM   #13
Bronco Guru
fungus's Avatar
Kaneohe Bay, Oahu
Joined: May 09
Posts: 1,548
I'd say for economy vs price you'd be best with a freshly gone through 5.0 with speed density EFI. Enough power to get you going, enough to keep you going, and relatively good mileage with the accuracy the SD sensors put into the computer. Won't handle HP upgrades on the motor well at all though but you might not need them. They're cheap to buy as most guys are looking for the MAF setups and super plentiful in the wrecking yards. Low mileage SD 5.0 w/ all the EFI stuff, new rings and seals maybe, drop it straight in, wire it up and your runnin'....

'69 Resto-Mod
'68 Family wheeler in the works
fungus is offline  
Old 04/29/10, 01:13 PM   #14
Bronco Guru
Joined: Aug 06
Posts: 2,057

My Gallery
Originally Posted by trailpsycho View Post
The 22RE wouldnt get you out of the parking lot. A Bronco weighs in at about 4-4.5K lbs, so the Toyota motor while a good motor for its breed, will not be very good one for the Bronco.
Just to play devils advocate, a bunch of the weight in a EB is in the drivetrain. The frame and body (without top) don't weigh significantly more than the body, box, and frame on a yota pickup. While working on my 85 solid axle pickup I started considering how easy and clean this swap would be. I'd put wedges on the front axle and use the Bronco coils. I know this is balsphemy but one could end up with a 20+ mpg capable rig that would definitly get you out of the parking lot. P/S, P/B, 5 speed, electric lockers front and rear, etc. Lots of HP mods for the 22R like super chargers etc.

Just a little thinkin outside the box. Please don't disown me.
Dave is online now  
Old 04/29/10, 01:20 PM   #15
Bronco Guru
grant_71's Avatar
Joined: Aug 02
Posts: 1,910
Originally Posted by Dave View Post
Just a little thinkin outside the box. Please don't disown me.
We would never disown you for that Dave, there are plenty of other reasons to do that!

As it was said before, if you need mileage, you need another car. I am not saying you cant get mileage out of a bronco (4bt) but the cost/time to get there isnt going to pay itself back anytime soon either

The beatings will continue until morale improves.
grant_71 is offline Forums > Archives > Bronco Chat - Archives

Thread Tools

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:16 AM.

Bulletin Board Software by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.

This site created, owned and maintained by Jon Hanna
Copyright © 1996-2018 All rights reserved. Privacy Statement is not affiliated with Ford Motor Company

Page generated in 0.35374 seconds with 59 queries