It can depend on the suspension lift.
The body lift raises the center of gravity but has no way to compensate for that. A suspension lift on the other hand can theoretically compensate for the higher center of gravity and additional body lean, by increasing the spring rate, or through the use of stiffer dampers.
Most variable rate front coils lose that advantage for the first couple of inches of travel, but then overcompensate by having a stiffer secondary rate than the original springs.
So you do get more compensation, but only after a certain point.
This presumes a softer than stock initial spring rate of course.
Most traditional leaf springs did increase the spring rate along with the amount of lift. So in the old days you also had more roll resistance with those lift springs. Lifted trucks often handled like they were on rails. But also rode like a tank.
The modern nine, 10 and 11 leaf packs however I’m just not sure about. They may very well still have an increased roll resistance and load capacity. Or they may not.
I just don’t know.
Even though their design details have reduced the overall ride harshness associated with stock type leaves, I don’t know if that means they are literally a softer rate or not.
That’s my take on it anyway. I feel a suspension lift can possibly help compensate for additional roll of the increased ride height, through the use of different spring rates.
Something a body lift just can’t do.
None of that takes into account any geometry changes having to do with track bar mounting locations and angles, and radius arm length.
Those add a whole new dimension of potential roll to a bronco.