needabronco
Bronco Guru
OK I finally got around to tuning my carb and dizzy.
First off, I've got a fresh 302, Edelbrock Performer cam, intake, and AVS 650 carb(I know it's a little big). MSD distributor with one blue and one silver spring to go full advance at or near 3000 RPMs. I live at approximately 6000' elevation, and I'm using the stock .095 primary jets, and a set of .068 x .047 rods.
When I had the timing set at 10* advanced, with the idle mixture screw (IMS)out 2 full turns from full lean, I got 14" if vacuum. Then I tried 6* advanced and with the IMS about a 1/2 turn richer I get between 12-13" of vacuum. The idle is set at approximately 750-800 RPMs. I tried .092 jets and it ran worse... I called the Edelbrock tech line and they told me that changing jets or rods wouldn't help, but suggested bigger rods anyway...
The 6* tuning feels better than the 10*, and it runs waaayyy better than it did, but does this sound right? I'm not really a carb guy so any help is absalutely appreciated.
Casey
First off, I've got a fresh 302, Edelbrock Performer cam, intake, and AVS 650 carb(I know it's a little big). MSD distributor with one blue and one silver spring to go full advance at or near 3000 RPMs. I live at approximately 6000' elevation, and I'm using the stock .095 primary jets, and a set of .068 x .047 rods.
When I had the timing set at 10* advanced, with the idle mixture screw (IMS)out 2 full turns from full lean, I got 14" if vacuum. Then I tried 6* advanced and with the IMS about a 1/2 turn richer I get between 12-13" of vacuum. The idle is set at approximately 750-800 RPMs. I tried .092 jets and it ran worse... I called the Edelbrock tech line and they told me that changing jets or rods wouldn't help, but suggested bigger rods anyway...
The 6* tuning feels better than the 10*, and it runs waaayyy better than it did, but does this sound right? I'm not really a carb guy so any help is absalutely appreciated.
Casey