• Just a reminder that you won't be able to start new posts or reply to existings posts in the Archive forum.

    This is where all the old posts go so they can still be used for reference and searched.
  • Welcome to ClassicBroncos! - You are currently viewing the forums as a GUEST. To take advantage of all the site features, please take a moment to register. It's fast, simple and absolutely free. So please join our community today!
    If you have problems registering or can't log into your account, please contact Admin.

Interesting article. Not sure how accurate it is. Military bronco

thegreatjustino

Contributor
Red Head Grease Monkey
Joined
Jan 23, 2002
Messages
16,008
Loc.
Stockton, CA
I had the opportunity to buy one in Sacramento a few years ago. It still had the military front seat and dash plaque. I didn't buy it because of the 170. I already had a 170 equipped Bronco, and like those quoted in the article think it's an anemic engine for such a heavy vehicle.

The guy who was selling it actually had two military Broncos. One he was building for himself, and I believe it was going to be turned into a standard cut and lifted Bronco. He didn't really care about the history of it. I'd like to know what happened to the one I drove and passed on.

I find it interesting in the article that it mentions power steering in the pre-delivery ones. Considering that PS was years off - even in the Stroppes, it makes me wonder if the statement is actually correct, and what did they use for the steering box if it was true.
 

NicksTrix

Bronco Guru
Joined
Aug 1, 2001
Messages
6,395
doesn't that camo pic one have the later model running lights, or are those just my old eyes?

power steering and brakes in an prototype? sounds odd that it would take 7-8 years + for those to make it to the line. though it is on the internet. it has to be true.....
 
Top