66 striker posts, comparing to new ones

[ngsd]

I jsut bought a couple new striker posts for my 66 from Wildhorse.

The choice was to get the 66-67 or 68 up. I have not installed them yet but noticed that the shape is different than the two 66 body's I have. Does anyone know f the repro ones are correct of if these are wrong? The two humps are different shapes than the original.

 

[DirtDonk]

In theory they should be identical. These are parts that don't (usually) get those little changes that so many parts get, where the look is different but the function is the same.
In the case of body parts, the shape, size, hole and flange orientations should be identical to the original.

But I'm having a hard time seeing what's different in the pics. Is it the height of the holes for the striker? Or something else?

Paul

 

[DirtDonk]

Your original looks to have been re-welded at some point. But if the holes in the old one are centered between the "bumps" and the new one is offset, then yes that seems odd.
When you lay them up against each other, is it the location of the bumps or the holes that is different?
Obviously the holes must match exactly or it won't match your latch. But check the door to make sure the latch location has not been modified too!

If that's what you're seeing, definitely give a call in the morning, or better yet e-mail a pic of them side by side to sales@wildhorses4x4.com with a pic of the offending piece, and someone can compare to others that are on the shelf.
And maybe if we're lucky, there is a '66 or two in the shop that can be compared as well.

What about the driver's side? Is it the same difference?

Paul

 

[ngsd]

Thanks Paul, i need to take better pictures. The shape of the humps are different. While this wont be a correct restoration I just wondered if these are the right ones before I dive in.

 

[ngsd]

here is a pic of the driver side that is a little better clarity. If you look at he shape of the hump below the striker is is longer and rectangular where the new post more crescent shaped.

 

[DirtDonk]

Pic didn't come through that time.
But now that I know what you're saying, I'll go back on my last answer and say that this shape is probably exactly the spot where the different manufacturer's might make a change. Or just see an issue and "let it go" when checking for final pattern.
I would not put it past the overseas stamping mill just doing what they want and the US importer shrugging their shoulders and saying "well, it's close enough, right?" and letting it pass.

But it still doesn't hurt to call and see if we have any stuffed away in a corner from a different manufacturer.
Probably not, but hey it can't hurt to ask.

Paul

 

[bamabaja]

Never used these parts but photos show difference on pillars. Good luck !

 

[ngsd]

Never used these parts but photos show difference on pillars. Good luck !

Thanks, that is a good example of the differences. The humps are different shape and I cant splice the new ones into the old ones due to that. The striker plate posts are different as well and the striker is a half inch further out than the original.

 

[ngsd]

Paul, I talked to Jeremy but he is not familiar with the sheet metal enough to discuss it. Who is the best person there to talk to about getting the correct posts. I ordered the 66-67 but the ones that came are as pictured int he 68-77 and are different as mentioned here.

 

[DirtDonk]

In this case, if it's as simple as getting the correct parts to replace incorrect ones, anyone can help and do a quick swap.
But in this case give Matt a call (or e-mail) and he'll be able to take care of just about anything you need.
I'm giving him a heads-up right now to expect some communication from you and what the issue is.

I'm a bit confused on the pics though, showing the strikers as basically the same height between early and late parts. It was always my understanding that, aside from the shape difference, the location of the striker and latch were different as well.
Is that not the case?

No matter though, we'll get some new ones coming as soon as you contact Matt.

Thanks. Sorry about the hassle.

Paul

 

[ngsd]

The pictures are for reference only as I don't have the measurements if this but it does show that the shape is different. As you mentioned, the striker positions are different and the ones that look like 68 up that were sent to me are certainly not correct measurements. I will call Matt. Thanks

 

[ngsd]

OK so I talked to Matt and am returning the posts and pillars. I guess the question for the group would be as to who sells the best correct ones. I see that on the pictures above that the ones that look correct are from United Pacific but never heard of them. Anyone deal with them?

Also, I have heard that the two piece door pillar posts from Taiwan are correct but do not fit well. Anyone with experience there? This 66-67 only thing is a little puzzling for me.

 

[ngsd]

Bamabaja, thanks for that link. I order d the striker posts from them and was concerned as I never heard of them. 5ey looked to be a rather large company but everyone on the internet does. The part was exactly as it was picture and the shape and contour was a match. Shipped quickly and just as described so I am happy so far. I have not fit them yet but they measure out and look to be the right part. Thanks again. I also ordered the two pice posts from DC so I will see how those work out when they arrive. This 66 difference is a little challenging.

 

[bamabaja]

Hey NGSD, thanks for feedback ! Now we know that is an option for us ‘66 folks.

 

[okie4570]

Let us know how they work out. I'll add this to the 1966 thread so others won't have to go through the same thing hopefully.