Search results

If I had the Art Carr AOD with AA kit installed that BCB sells...and I have a dana 20, will they just bolt together, or is there something else that has to be done (machining, disassembly, etc.)? The reason I'm asking is because I found a shop that sells the aod with adapter installed and they...

If you have the AA dana 20 kit put on an AOD (kind of like the Art Carr AOD that BCB sells)...will the dana 20 simply bolt right up, or is there more to it?

Does anyone make fender flares that mount without using or seeing the rivets? James Duff had the area 51 flares in their old catalog, but not on their website..I don't know if they ever produced them..

Does anybody have any contact info for the vintage glass company that's referenced in the above thread???

Anybody have pics of their bronco with 35" tires and 20" wheels, and how much lift are you running?

Thanks RJ....we'll all be waiting for your observations......

Like G's Baja Bronco said - "AOD 91 to 93 with 4RW70 internals (1998 and up) you get lower first and second gears plus the mechanical diode." All the benefits of the 4RW70, but without the electronics..it uses a detent cable instead.

Broncobowsher..do you run the explorer engine, if so what MAF do you run... Viper...are you willing to run the 94-95 70mm MAF on your vehicle. If so could you report back any significant changes? i.e. idle, surgine, mpg, etc. You can get them used on ebay for around $40 and probably dirt...

Or maybe the 70mm MAFs just DON'T work.......(without a custom tune)!

Viper....."If stretch was using a '94-'95 mustang MAF that's only one data point" I'm not sure what you mean by this?

Hey viper...what MAF are you running?

Can you really compare those numbers, since the computers were matched to the MAF and they all used different computers?????? I think the proof is there...both Stretch and Lars tried the larger MAF sensors and they didn't work (without a custom tune in Lars' case). I guess the real question...

I sent him a private message............... Re: MAF question -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Quote: Originally Posted by charlien When you were having problems with your MAF...you said you were using the 70mm MAF to start..was this the...

http://classicbroncos.com/forums/showthread.php?t=169420&highlight=running+lean Stretch started with the 70mm MAF, but had issues and switched to the 55mm MAF and solved all of his problems......all the numbers look close, but it didn't work for him. He has the 98 explorer 5.0 with explorer TB.

what color is your hard top? do you have any pics with it on?

------A9L ---- 94-95 Cobra ---- 94-95 GT 1V ---- 15cfm ---- 15cfm ---- 15cfm 2v ---- 50cfm ---- 50cfm ---- 50cfm 3v ---- 130cfm ---- 125cfm ---- 125cfm 4v ---- 265cfm ---- 255cfm ----...

Hey viper...use a conversion factor of .5 (divide kg/hr in half) and convert the kg/hr to cfm and replot them if you don't mind...let's see what that looks like.

Do you think that running with a mismatched MAF/PCM combo causes the computer to run closed loop (off O2 sensors), that's why people are having surge problems? "In CL mode, the ECU will continually cycle the A/F ratio lean, then rich, over and over, hovering the A/F ratio closely around the...

-Stock 5.0L 55MM MAF (89-93 Mustangs) flows 606 CFM. -Stock 5.0L 60 MM TB flows 526 CFM. -A 300 cubic inch engine (302 c.i.) flows 521 CFM at 6,000 rpm. -I can't find any flow ratings on the explorer 70mm TB, but bases off other TBs, it's probably around 700 CFM. These are numbers I found on...

http://classicbroncos.com/forums/showthread.php?t=175289 Please read this post...The transfer data for all of those 70mm MAF sensors is not the same as that of the A9* computer. Although it would probably work, it is not optimal.