Well he said he got a valid one with the vehicle. Just saying once you've bought it its yours. If 18 months later you cant pass smog then its your problem.
A different glove box cover with an older VIN and a title to match is all you need...![]()
if you install a mustang, cougar, t-bird EFI, then you can get it cleared by the BAR as long as it has ALL of the equipment that vehicle came with. example, if you install mustang EFi, if it came with dual exhaust with an H pipe and 4 catalytic converters, gotta have all of them.
I registered my 1973 in CA 6 months ago. The vehicle inspector told me that CA registration requires a pair of matching VIN numbers on the vehicle. Vehicles with only one visible VIN number have to go to the highway patrol for inspection before the DMV can move forward with the registration.
It sounds like CA is so backwards
Went through the same process with my 77. Referee can pretty much do what they want when it comes to signing off on your engine swap. My 89 mustang motor had to have all the emissions equipment. But I did not need the 4 cats that originally came with the 89 mustang. It passed with 1 cat and headers from wild horses, k&n filter and adjustable fuel reg. wrote my new sticker up as exhaust system to match year of chasis. Bottom line is don't try to hide anything. Some referees are better than others. Good luck.
Given what you have said previously, I think it would better for you to try and put all the smog equipment for 77 back on your rig. If you can find it... The stuff can be like Gold... When I bought mine the PO had put a tired 90 mustang mortor in it, since the original motor grenaded. He could not get it to work so that it would pass smog. So it sat for over a year. I bought it as is and got it running... I had to track down parts... Air injection check valve was $100.00, the hardest part to find was a plastic fitting that fit into the air cleaner so the hose from the charcol canister would attach properly.
I had to adapt the 90's air injection to the heads to the factory air pump... lots of vacuum lines. the sticker on the valve cover showed that it was a Federal emissions vehicle (49 State)
I have found that the smog check people are clueless about older vehicles, most of then are born after 1977. They rely on the book, if they can find the pictures of the emissions equipment... The Smog Referee is a crap shoot, mine had to look things up in the book and on line. You cannot argue with them, they are God. You have to do what they say... "You need to have a vacuum resevoir" What?, Why?, you know that it serves no purpose for emissions, it is for the donor cars HVAC system to control the units doors with vacuum. "You need to have it as it is in the vacuum routing diagram"
If you talk to the Referee, and he runs the vehicle's VIN the computer, then you are in the DMV's system. Better to talk to him in general terms about what you need...
You do not provide the referee with the VIN of the vehicle the engine came out of. A simple description will suffice. 88-93 5.0 Mustang engines you can get away with an auto or manual computer in either configuration. Be sure you have a neutral safety switch or clutch switch rigged up so you can get the computer to go into Key On Engine Running (KOER) self-test mode. The ref allowed my to do this with alligator clips hooked to paperclips in the back of the ECU to 'trick' it into thinking the truck was in neutral.
Clarifing my VIN comment... If he brought his bronco in to a smog check station and they started the test only to fail him because he is missing components, that failure is entered into the DMV files...
On that front you are right. Gross polluter brings the suck.
The Referee scanned the bar code on the computer to determin if I had the correct ECU for my manual transmission bronco. The Landcruser in front of me had an automatic transmission ECU for its Vortec and NV4500. It failed. It also did not have the fuel tank feedback system that the 96 donor vehicle had, it failed on that too...
I went in with one cat, but he would not even run it to see what came out the pipe. I guess the message we can provide is that the experience going to a Referee is not the same through out this state... Which Referee did you see, was he local...
I went to the one at Evergreen College. There is a lot of mystery regarding the automatic vs manual on the computer and the referee. The issue with the GM computer is that it looks for the automatic computer and will throw a code (and thus not operate the emissions system) if the TCM isn't talking to the ECM. My buddy is starting a 6.0 LQ9 swap in a Toyota and has figured out that he can reflash the PCM with EFILive to the parameters of a manual 6 Speed truck/car and pass the ECM scanning. Short of scanning the .bin file in the memory (which the referee does not have the equipment to do) there is no way to track this change.
I can only speak from my experience, that the referee did not check the physical computer. If EEC-IV controlled the transmission, it would obviously throw a code if it weren't connected and thus; fail. There is no specificity regarding the transmission on an engine change, so you may be correct, or I may be correct depending on which referee you get.