That had to suck. I won't disput what the FAA says in their manual, but unless they were talking about wires 22ga or smaller, I think they need to give their heads a shake. The junctions they had issues with were probably on a flex or pivot point in the loom, and would have broke whether crimped or soldered. If they would have used quad wall heat shrink, the wires would have broke at one of the ends instead.
I just finished a Lancaster generator that had 5 of its 20+ mounting bolts sheered off due to vibration. The welded and soldered connections internally survived. The crimped connection on the brush leads didn't on one of the six brushes. More ironically is this was what I attributed the majority of the extra vibration in the generator to. But anyway..........
An automotive application is far more severe than an airplane. Wire is exposed to salt, grease, oil, gas, extreme temperatures, acidic fumes, etc, etc. The last time I was near a plane its wiring was fairly well protected. Far better than an automobiles. The planes certainly didn't have computers hanging from them.
The harmonic vibrations a Detriot 60 series motor gives off are what legends are made of. Until they made a pad mount alternator for them, an alternator would last less than year before most of its mounting holes were severely out of round and loose. Electrical it survived, but the housings were always junk. They literally shake themselves apart.
Hope I don't seem like I am trying to start an arguement, I am not. (This answered a question I had, as i wonder why the brush leads were only soldered on the one end, and just crimped on the other) The FAA likely had good reason to adopt the policy it did. Without seeing the data personally, I can't say I agree or disagree with it. Just my personal experience and plain logic suggests that I should suspect their findings.