• Just a reminder that you won't be able to start new posts or reply to existings posts in the Archive forum.

    This is where all the old posts go so they can still be used for reference and searched.
  • Welcome to ClassicBroncos! - You are currently viewing the forums as a GUEST. To take advantage of all the site features, please take a moment to register. It's fast, simple and absolutely free. So please join our community today!
    If you have problems registering or can't log into your account, please contact Admin.

Most desirable 351W engine year?

red67

Sr. Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2001
Messages
423
Loc.
Austin Texas
What is the most desirable year to obtain for a swap? Are blocks or heads better some years than others? For a performance build up, what block year should one look for?
%) just curious...
 

Skuzzlebutt

PhD, Dr. of Broncology
Joined
May 26, 2001
Messages
4,393
Loc.
Honeymoon Bay
69/70 heads are considered the best. That's what makes them hard to find. They aren't magical tho, most aftermarket heads are better.
 

Ryan

Sr. Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2003
Messages
739
Loc.
Lansing, MI
94-up Blocks are roller cam ready number starts with F4 on the block
Explorer GT40P heads are the best production head in stock form, but are a major pain on exhaust headers.
Lightning engines had standard GT40 heads some are roller cam ready
Roush 180 heads from World Products are pretty good for low RPM engines
 
OP
OP
red67

red67

Sr. Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2001
Messages
423
Loc.
Austin Texas
I have a 70 351W motor in my EB right now that the PO stuck in there. I am having blow by, and I know it is time for a rebuild. I was just wondering if it was worth rebuilding. I heard that some blocks were stronger than others. I was attempting to find out if there was a significant advantage of rebuilding the current motor or just spending a grand on Kragen long block with a warrenty?:?
 

mustangmarty

Bronco Guru
Joined
Apr 1, 2003
Messages
1,229
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I heard that the 69 - 70 blocks had a higher nickel content in them and so are better for wear. But then again, they weren't roller blocks like the later Windsor blocks are. I chose to go with the 69 block and have it retro-fitted for a roller cam.
 

66roadhorse

Sr. Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2003
Messages
380
Loc.
Houston
The pre 74 blocks had a higher nickel content and in theory are a little stronger. The later blocks had a different rear main seal that is a little better than the early ones. For a bronco, you should be fine rebuilding what you have as long as it has never been rebuilt before.
 

Skuzzlebutt

PhD, Dr. of Broncology
Joined
May 26, 2001
Messages
4,393
Loc.
Honeymoon Bay
mustangmarty said:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I heard that the 69 - 70 blocks had a higher nickel content in them and so are better for wear. But then again, they weren't roller blocks like the later Windsor blocks are. I chose to go with the 69 block and have it retro-fitted for a roller cam.

I've heard that too, and you'll hear the same thing about "HECHO EN MEXICO" 302s. Most expert builders say that while it may be true, the difference is so slight that it's really not worth considering.
There has never been any year of W blocks that were considered weak.
 

Broncobowsher

Total hack
Joined
Jun 4, 2002
Messages
35,121
red67 said:
What is the most desirable year to obtain for a swap? Are blocks or heads better some years than others? For a performance build up, what block year should one look for?
%) just curious...

This is a bit of a loaded question. The choices depend a lot on what you plan to do. If you just want to pull something out of a junk car and drop it is will be a different recomendition if you want to pick up an engine and do a cheap rebuild, wich is different then if you want to build a high dollar engine.

If you can get an engine in perfect condition that isn't worn out and in need of a rebuild and you don't want to do anything to it, the '69-'70 is the best. the 4V having flat tops and more compression the better choice. Now the chances of finding a 35 year old engine that is perfect are not good.

If you are going to build something, the post '71 blocks have a little more deck height and that is what most of the aftermarket considers a standard 351.

All stock heads suck. The 69-70 heads suck the least. If you don't get 351 heads, the bolt holes on the 289-302 heads can be drilled out. For good heads, look aftermarket if you can afford them.

Late model 351s are roller cammed. This is a great performance/anti-friction upgrade. Also late model blocks are newer and haven't had as much time to wear out. Modern machining has better tolerences then the stuff of old. Also late model blocks have 1 piece seals, much better at controlling oil leaks.

As far as I know, there are no "bad" years for 351s. Some years were heavily smogged, but if you rebuild a '69 and a '79 to the same specs, they will run the same. Don't worry about the factory HP ratings unless you plan to drop in the engine bone stock, including the convertor and air filter.
 

BUCKETOBOLTS

Bronco Guru
Joined
Oct 28, 2003
Messages
1,605
Loc.
Salisbury, NC
Most desirable is going to be left up to the purchaser. Little things like castings, cams, and such can all be worked around. The main thing to remember is that their is no replacement for displacement. :eek:
 
Top