Jdgephar
Bronco Guru
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2012
- Messages
- 1,384
Hey Everyone,
Since I upgraded my old points distributor to Duraspark, I've been doing some reading on the timing curves. Now that it's starting to get warm enough out to take the Bronco on some test runs, I've found that the new distributor timing doesn't work so well.
Here is what I have found. I started at 6* timing at idle. Winding up the engine brought me up to about 26* total advance. I'm not sure at what RPM, but total is somewhere close to 3000 RPM. I didn't have a helper to check the RPM. I've opened up the distributor to confirm the 10L advance curve, so I know the total mechanical advance is correct.
On the road test drive shows performance drop significantly after 3000 RPM. I then bumped the timing up to 15* at idle, for a total of 35*. Much better, but still some hesitation at RPMs above 3000.
I feel that it's still not enough timing at higher RPMs, but I'm not sure how high I can safely go. I haven't heard any pinging yet. So, this evening I took apart the distributor and changed the advance to the 15L arm. Now I'll get 30* mechanical advance plus the initial. My plan is to start at 8* initial, for a total of 38*, and keep the initial timing lower for easier starts. I'll have to test it out tomorrow, if it doesn't snow again tonight.
A couple other notes. Vacuum advance line is pulled and plugged for this testing. 302 engine, has a mild cam (wish I knew the specs), stock heads for a 70s 302.
Has anyone else here done work on the recurve of the dizzy? Any advice on the settings to try out? I really wish I did more research on this before I removed the old dizzy and sold it. I'm thinking it just needs more advance to run well at the higher RPMs like it used to. I'm assuming that the old dizzy was also on the 10L arm. If it was, that might explain why I thought the initial timing was way too high (over 20*). But that was the sweet spot where it really liked to run with that dizzy, which I'm guessing was close to 40* total. The old dizzy was real picky about running well through the lower RPMs and not pinging under load.
If anything, I'll just keep tweaking and testing. But that's why we all own one of these, right?
Since I upgraded my old points distributor to Duraspark, I've been doing some reading on the timing curves. Now that it's starting to get warm enough out to take the Bronco on some test runs, I've found that the new distributor timing doesn't work so well.
Here is what I have found. I started at 6* timing at idle. Winding up the engine brought me up to about 26* total advance. I'm not sure at what RPM, but total is somewhere close to 3000 RPM. I didn't have a helper to check the RPM. I've opened up the distributor to confirm the 10L advance curve, so I know the total mechanical advance is correct.
On the road test drive shows performance drop significantly after 3000 RPM. I then bumped the timing up to 15* at idle, for a total of 35*. Much better, but still some hesitation at RPMs above 3000.
I feel that it's still not enough timing at higher RPMs, but I'm not sure how high I can safely go. I haven't heard any pinging yet. So, this evening I took apart the distributor and changed the advance to the 15L arm. Now I'll get 30* mechanical advance plus the initial. My plan is to start at 8* initial, for a total of 38*, and keep the initial timing lower for easier starts. I'll have to test it out tomorrow, if it doesn't snow again tonight.
A couple other notes. Vacuum advance line is pulled and plugged for this testing. 302 engine, has a mild cam (wish I knew the specs), stock heads for a 70s 302.
Has anyone else here done work on the recurve of the dizzy? Any advice on the settings to try out? I really wish I did more research on this before I removed the old dizzy and sold it. I'm thinking it just needs more advance to run well at the higher RPMs like it used to. I'm assuming that the old dizzy was also on the 10L arm. If it was, that might explain why I thought the initial timing was way too high (over 20*). But that was the sweet spot where it really liked to run with that dizzy, which I'm guessing was close to 40* total. The old dizzy was real picky about running well through the lower RPMs and not pinging under load.
If anything, I'll just keep tweaking and testing. But that's why we all own one of these, right?