• Just a reminder that you won't be able to start new posts or reply to existings posts in the Archive forum.

    This is where all the old posts go so they can still be used for reference and searched.
  • Welcome to ClassicBroncos! - You are currently viewing the forums as a GUEST. To take advantage of all the site features, please take a moment to register. It's fast, simple and absolutely free. So please join our community today!
    If you have problems registering or can't log into your account, please contact Admin.

Engineers - please chime in on this thread...

SaddleUp

Bronco Guru
Joined
May 23, 2004
Messages
9,655
Loc.
Vancouver, WA
trailpsycho said:
That bolt is in a shackle, if I remember right making it a double shear...but it may have been single. Still impressive.

John
No more impressive (to me anyway) than the pin in the average hook on a winch. That's even smaller and is often subjected to an even greater pull. Great sales gimmick though.
 
OP
OP
Mark

Mark

Contributor
Bronco Klutz
Joined
Aug 29, 2003
Messages
5,414
Loc.
NW Indiana
SaddleUp said:
No more impressive (to me anyway) than the pin in the average hook on a winch. That's even smaller and is often subjected to an even greater pull. Great sales gimmick though.
Those tiny pins have got to be the weak link! I have trouble trusting them.
You should see the pins on the D-rings that I upgrade to - as thick as your thumb!
 

drader

Newbie
Joined
Nov 25, 2004
Messages
8
Anyone have pics of the safest setup. I plan on installing shoulders sometime soon. Any link, pics, or advise is appreciated.
 

SaddleUp

Bronco Guru
Joined
May 23, 2004
Messages
9,655
Loc.
Vancouver, WA
drader said:
Anyone have pics of the safest setup. I plan on installing shoulders sometime soon. Any link, pics, or advise is appreciated.
This probably isn't what your looking for but it is what I consider as pretty safe. 5 point belts tied directly to the roll cage at all 5 points. Additionally the seats are connected directly to the cage as well. Connected in this manner the entire roll cage can be ripped loose from the body and the occupants will all hopefully stay inside the cage where it will be the safest. The rear seat doesn't have quite as much protection. It only has 3 point belts. The seat and belts for it though are also tied directly to the cage.
SaddleUp69.jpg
 

4x4x289

Sr. Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2004
Messages
964
More info.

I found this pic at http://www.stockcarracing.com/howto/scrp_0603_racing_seatbelt_installation/

The direction of force for both of these applications is assumed UP towards the top of the picture. For the application on the right, the bracket acts as a crowbar against the bolt head causing increased stress on the right side of the bolt shank and also on the bracket. The increased stress on the bolt and bracket is caused by moment. This senerio is simular to attempting to pop off a cap of a beer bottle. Will it fail? I don't know, -it depends on the strength of your hardware and the pull. There are no Yes/No answers. The only thing I am willing to say is that the BOLT and BRACKET on the left are "less likely" to fail "only if" the BOLTS and BRACKETS are equal on both sides, and "only if" the force which causes the failure is up. This does NOT mean failure will occur, or that your steel tab(s), welds, or base metal won’t fail first. Your total system strength is only as strong as your weakest link. Your weakest link, in fact, might be considered your torso as stated earlier. If, in fact, the bolt or bracket fails on the right, to help visualize it, the two likely failure scenarios are like actually removing a bear bottle cap, or pulling a plastic six pack ring off a single beer can.

Yes the application on the right is commonly used by industry, HOWEVER, the application on the right for industry is generally for forces going to the RIGHT, ie., with bolt mainly in shear (single shear BTW, with some moment), and remember that industry does test it. The bolt on the left sees double shear with force going up.

I value the opinions of a people with experience. To engineer is human. A non-engineer can still build something based on knowledge of prior success and failur, comparisons, i.e, experience. When in doubt, an item can still be tested. An engineer is not god. An engineer can still misguide, miscalculate, misapply, or fail to calculate/evaluate a failure that actually occurs.
 

SaddleUp

Bronco Guru
Joined
May 23, 2004
Messages
9,655
Loc.
Vancouver, WA
4x4x289 said:
More info.

I found this pic at http://www.stockcarracing.com/howto/scrp_0603_racing_seatbelt_installation/

The direction of force for both of these applications is assumed UP towards the top of the picture. For the application on the right, the bracket acts as a crowbar against the bolt head causing increased stress on the right side of the bolt shank and also on the bracket. The increased stress on the bolt and bracket is caused by moment. This senerio is simular to attempting to pop off a cap of a beer bottle. Will it fail? I don't know, -it depends on the strength of your hardware and the pull. There are no Yes/No answers. The only thing I am willing to say is that the BOLT and BRACKET on the left are "less likely" to fail "only if" the BOLTS and BRACKETS are equal on both sides, and "only if" the force which causes the failure is up. This does NOT mean failure will occur, or that your steel tab(s), welds, or base metal won’t fail first. Your total system strength is only as strong as your weakest link. Your weakest link, in fact, might be considered your torso as stated earlier. If, in fact, the bolt or bracket fails on the right, to help visualize it, the two likely failure scenarios are like actually removing a bear bottle cap, or pulling a plastic six pack ring off a single beer can.

Yes the application on the right is commonly used by industry, HOWEVER, the application on the right for industry is generally for forces going to the RIGHT, ie., with bolt mainly in shear (single shear BTW, with some moment), and remember that industry does test it. The bolt on the left sees double shear with force going up.

I value the opinions of a people with experience. To engineer is human. A non-engineer can still build something based on knowledge of prior success and failur, comparisons, i.e, experience. When in doubt, an item can still be tested. An engineer is not god. An engineer can still misguide, miscalculate, misapply, or fail to calculate/evaluate a failure that actually occurs.
Great article. Looks like I got mine set up right.
 
Top