• Just a reminder that you won't be able to start new posts or reply to existings posts in the Archive forum.

    This is where all the old posts go so they can still be used for reference and searched.
  • Welcome to ClassicBroncos! - You are currently viewing the forums as a GUEST. To take advantage of all the site features, please take a moment to register. It's fast, simple and absolutely free. So please join our community today!
    If you have problems registering or can't log into your account, please contact Admin.

Has anyone tried these connectors

RustBeltRefugee

New Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2011
Messages
70
Loc.
Santa Clarita
Has anyone tried these on their gauge cluster or any other connection and are they any good?

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/rnb-85845

I am planning to do a rewire and I thought these would be nice but I am worried that the insulation might crack over time and they might not connect to the terminals well. They aren't very expensive so I might give them a try.
 

nickgp

Bronco Guru
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
1,024
Nice idea. I may look into it too. However, nothing wrong w good quality crimps and nuts.
 

Broncobowsher

Total hack
Joined
Jun 4, 2002
Messages
35,664
I prefer an eyelet terminal, small lockwasher and nut. Production line work was about speed and good enough.
 

jw0747

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
2,434
Loc.
San Antonio, TX
Don't like them because from my experience sometimes they are too deep to make a good connection or the terminal is too short. Never tried trimming them but guess you could. I also like eyelet type with a l.w. and nut which guarantees a good connection.
 

Slowleak

Bronco Guru
Joined
Sep 12, 2013
Messages
3,833
Loc.
Georgia
There is probably a good reason why these are not commonly used. My experience with them, in older british cars, is that they tend to be prone to corrosion. You should not have to "wiggle wires" to make things work and I found myself doing that.
 
OP
OP
R

RustBeltRefugee

New Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2011
Messages
70
Loc.
Santa Clarita
Thanks for all the feedback. I think that I am going to stick with using eyelet terminals with nuts. I was thinking that these might be easier for servicing but it sounds like they might cause other problems with off road use.
 

DirtDonk

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Nov 3, 2003
Messages
49,325
They are definitely nicer for servicing, but you've already heard the potential tradeoffs. And besides, as far as service goes, just how often are you likely to mess around with your gauges?
The good point about them though, is that those threaded studs on the backs of the gauges can twist out and break if you're not a little bit careful. And if you have an older Centech kit you're installing with the Nyloc type nuts, either be SUPER careful and use your personal feeler gauge (your hands and brain) or just don't use them.
There are horror stories...

Ford did in fact use that type of connector on four circuits (maybe more?) under our hoods. The environment is more stressful, and they are on "service items" so to speak, but they are also prone to loosening up over time.
Oddly enough, two of the four circuits are for the gauges. Water temp and oil press.
The other two, START and IGN for the starter relay, also fail over time. Though not as often as the sending units in my experience.

Unfortunately for buying something like that through mailorder, there are actually two different sizes of those push-on connectors. Not sure if it's actual part number variations, or just shoddy quality control and they're just inconsistent. But I've had a number of them that did not fit easily over the starter relay terminals.

If you decide to try them at some point anyway, maybe measure your posts and check the part's specifications just to be sure.

Paul
 
Top