• Welcome to ClassicBroncos! - You are currently viewing the forums as a GUEST. To take advantage of all the site features, please take a moment to register. It's fast, simple and absolutely free. So please join our community today!
    If you have problems registering or can't log into your account, please contact Admin.

Sanderson headers

DirtDonk

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Nov 3, 2003
Messages
51,619
Where Broncos are concerned, shorty headers are strictly a choice based on the “easier to fit” scenario. That includes the easier to install with a single exhaust system. Or duals, run down just the passenger side.
You don’t choose them for maximum high RPM power, or maximum torque. There are other parameters that handle those, besides short or long.

If done correctly, long tube headers will almost always out perform the shorties. But here again, for the typical Bronco usage, fewer bragging rights is not a performance disadvantage on the trail, on the street, or cruising the mall.
If you’re really cheering for max performance, bigger primaries, longer collectors, and larger diameter, tubing, will almost always get you where you’re going.
With exceptions, of course…
Where you can fit it, a 30 inch collector length is typically the sweet spot for headers. Good luck fitting that in a bronco every time though. Probably can be done, but it ain’t always gonna be easy. Or pretty…
Then again, there are almost always exceptions, of course…😉😁

The 30 inch length came, if I’m remembering the length correctly, from multiple episodes of Engine Masters.

For you rheiser, what power level is your 347 intended to reach? What did their dyno sheets show?
Depending upon that answer, you could find anything from 1.5 inch tubes, all the way to 1.75 tubes!
You’ll almost never need a dual 3” exhaust, but dual 2 1/2’s could support pretty much anything you want. And be easier to route through a bronco chassis.
A single 3 inch however, with the right muffler, and the right type of merge, could be the best combination.
For a Bronco anyway…

And, as was mentioned before for the OP, verify that the cylinder heads are not designed for a specific size of flange.
For some heads, an 1.5 inch tube design would be too small. For other heads, a 1.75 would be too big.
What does Blueprint say?
 

rheiser

Old Man
Joined
Jun 7, 2009
Messages
32
Loc.
Cincinnati-ish
For you rheiser, what power level is your 347 intended to reach? What did their dyno sheets show?

I actually didn't get a dyno sheet, but that's a long story I can detail somewhere else. The dyno sheets I've seen hit pretty close to their advertised power; ~420 hp.

Depending upon that answer, you could find anything from 1.5 inch tubes, all the way to 1.75 tubes!
You’ll almost never need a dual 3” exhaust, but dual 2 1/2’s could support pretty much anything you want. And be easier to route through a bronco chassis.
A single 3 inch however, with the right muffler, and the right type of merge, could be the best combination.
For a Bronco anyway…

Yeah, and that's another factor. I'm definitely not interested in having something that's more difficult to work on than it needs to be. As mentioned earlier in the thread, 5 hp at 5500 RPM is not something I care much about, especially if it comes at a disproportionate cost (in money, time, effort, etc.)

And, as was mentioned before for the OP, verify that the cylinder heads are not designed for a specific size of flange.
For some heads, an 1.5 inch tube design would be too small. For other heads, a 1.75 would be too big.
What does Blueprint say?
They do have a blurb about headers on their site: https://blueprintengines.com/pages/header-recommendations (SPOILER: Ultimate Headers, Sanderson, and Lemons)
The list has changed since I first looked at it, it used to have Heddman's on it, I think. I've done a little investigating, and I've seen a lot of success with different headers, but I'm nervous to take the risk, and have them not fit. Their customer support has been great so far, so I'll probably give them a shout now that the time for a decision is getting close.

Another detail that they mention: don't break in the engine with new ceramic headers. I've read the reasons, and I'd hate to mess up the coating on an expensive set of headers. I'm looking for an alternative, though. I'll probably put on my old headers, if they fit (they have a broken flange on the passenger side, come to find out), and if I can get them back from the guy I gave my old engine to.

Anyway, apologies to the OP for hijacking. Hopefully some of this info is useful to him too.
 
Top