Oh, and while I'm stuck on this tangent, the Nissan M226 is really a derivation of the Dana 44HD, as found in the 1996 ZJ. So who came first? People had been putting Ford Dana 50HP gears into Dana 44HP housings since the 80's. The M226 is like a Dana 44HD with a 226mm ring gear used in a Nissan and called a M226. I don't think it has much in common with the later JL/JT Jeep M226.
The "Dana 44" brand really didn't mean much to anyone until the middle 70's and even then it was only used to make the distinction between the "good one" and the "bad one." When GM started using the Corporate 10 bolt in the front of their K series truck, you could get a Dana axle, or a GM corporate axle. Both had 10 cover bolts. But the Dana axle was much preferred due to aftermarket support. So then everyone wanted a Dana 44. Prior to that, during the muscle car era, the Mopar Dana 60 was the dominant brand. and prior to that, (mid 60's) if you wanted a decent limited slip in your half ton ford pickup...you ordered it with a Dana 60. Nobody ever gave a crap that you had a Dana 44 in your 1950 Mercury. Or even that you had a Dana 44 in your pre-57 F100. It's not really a very strong axle, compared to a 9 inch or a 60. Fast forward to the 2000's, and everyone wants a Dana 44 in their Jeep. Mostly because the AMC Corporate 20 was a pile of crap, and the 72-75 CJ5 Dana 44 was vastly better. And the branding wars began. Then a PAIR of Dana 44's in a TJ Rubicon, and we have reached Nirvana. (almost as strong as an early Bronco or Scout 2!)
Now everybody knows that they want a "Dana 44" in their off road rig. So the manufacturers are happy to oblige. So they put a whole bunch of different stuff out there, and name it all "Dana 44" The problem is that the Dana 44 in your Jeep Wrangler JL is about twice as strong as the Dana 44 in your Early Bronco. And twice again as strong as the Dana 44 IFS in your mid 80's F250. Which is about twice as strong as the dana 44 in your 1950 Willys CJ3A.
Gotta run.