...the old 3 pin flasher used to drive a single dash indicator is a flasher relay.
I've never seen one, either IRL or in a wiring diagram. All the old OE 3-pin flashers I've seen (and those I have) are simply flashers whose heating elements are externally grounded, exactly like modern solid-state replacement flashers with an added external ground wire so they can work with LEDs.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00PM3COJA
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00JXLH7CG
I don't know what "flasher relay" means, or how it's different from a "relay". The name suggests that, given a steady trigger current, it would flash the load. That's technically what a "flasher" does, IF you consider the heating element to be an independent circuit (and it sort of IS in a 3-pin flasher). But rather than using a magnetic solenoid, a flasher commonly uses a bimetallic strip to make/break the circuit. So are you saying that a "flasher relay" contains something to turn a magnetic relay on & off? Then that first link above is a "flasher relay", but it's called an "electronic flasher" (now; back in the 90s they were called "solid-state flashers").
Nothing to do with big vs small current.
True, but that's how they're primarily used. The relay name refers to the fact that the trigger circuit is discrete, and so is the load circuit. So the current in the trigger is "relayed" to the load, without actually FLOWING to the load - they're isolated. You might use a common 3A relay to control a 1A LED, but that doesn't change the fact that it's a relay.
The “I” terminal on the Ford starter relay is an isolation relay.
It's EXACTLY as isolated as the 2 main terminals, so I don't follow your logic, or that nomenclature. Every relay isolates the load from the trigger. That's what makes them relays. To call some of them "isolation relays" doesn't make sense to me.
...and just to state the obvious: the I on that terminal means "Ignition" - not isolation.
But it is still convection.
Only in the sense of heat being transferred to an intermediate fluid, but that's not what anyone means when saying "convection currents" (which is admittedly redundant) - they mean the natural un-forced flow caused by a fluid being hotter & less-dense below (in the sense of gravity) a connected area of the same fluid that's cooler & more-dense. Same as atmospheric turbulence for airplanes. The only difference between conventional & convection ovens is the fan. But a fan doesn't cause convection or cooking, so it's a misnomer.
The starter relay on the Bronco has a solenoid inside of it.
So does the horn relay. And virtually every other relay (not solid-state relays). We don't name things for ONE of their component subsystems. Do you call your Bronco a "relay"? It has one inside it. The solenoid (in the relay) has a wire inside it - should we start calling solenoids "wires"? A relay is called that because of its overall function.
The Delco starter solenoid also has a relay function.
So does the Ford starter solenoid, and most other brands of starter solenoids. But that's a secondary purpose for all of them. You can tell because it draws a LOT more current than needed to close that switch, so that's
not its main function. It has to draw that much to pull the Bendix into the flywheel, so
that's its main function, making it a solenoid. The fact that it's convenient, cheap, easy, & efficient to add a switch to the back (making it also perform a relay function) doesn't change what it is.
...it does in fact dampen the shock load. (By transferring it to the passenger…
Again - your terminology doesn't make sense to me. A "damped" shock load is NOT a shock load. Those terms in this context are opposites, and mutually exclusive. If the shock was damped, it
wasn't a shock; if it WAS a shock, then what got damped? But the term "spring damper" is very meaningful, in that it adds friction to the system to dissipate the spring's energy and reduce the motion it's causing. That doesn't transfer anything perceptible to the passenger - it only heats the oil in the damper (shock absorber) and then slowly releases that heat to the air.
And if the spring doesn't absorb the shock, what's its purpose? Would the "shock absorber" still absorb shocks if there were no spring?