• Welcome to ClassicBroncos! - You are currently viewing the forums as a GUEST. To take advantage of all the site features, please take a moment to register. It's fast, simple and absolutely free. So please join our community today!
    If you have problems registering or can't log into your account, please contact Admin.

Bronco standards vs Mustang

Speedrdr

Contributor
Legend in my own mind
Joined
Nov 27, 2017
Messages
2,028
Loc.
Paris, MS
Not to sound like a shameless plug here. But I run the Explorer components in everything I own with a SBF. But it's not just for the EFI. The Explorer fan is better, the alternator is better, the water pump is less likely to leak, the power steering pump is better, and the shorter front dress makes it more enjoyable to work on if needed.
Unless you've got something super rare that should be left 100% original, anything is forgivable (except a GM engine swap).
If I understand correctly, if the Explorer front dress will fit any small block Ford, it will fit the ‘91 mustang 5.0 that’s in my EB. Does it make any difference if it’s now a 347 stroker with edlebrock intake and carb and AFR heads? May be a stupid question with all the posts about Explorer swaps, but trying to make sure before I start looking for said front dress.
Also, does it matter what year explorer?
 

Broncobowsher

Total hack
Joined
Jun 4, 2002
Messages
37,068
If I understand correctly, if the Explorer front dress will fit any small block Ford, it will fit the ‘91 mustang 5.0 that’s in my EB. Does it make any difference if it’s now a 347 stroker with edlebrock intake and carb and AFR heads? May be a stupid question with all the posts about Explorer swaps, but trying to make sure before I start looking for said front dress.
Also, does it matter what year explorer?
It will fit. What balance is the stroker kit? There are 3 options, although I typically see the 50 oz-in being pretty common for milder versions as it works with the typical late model stuff. And you need the Explorer damper, witch is the late model 50 oz-in, but can be modified into anything. I once bought a balanced stroker kit, took the damper that came with it and the Explorer to a balance shop and they made the Explorer match perfectly what came with the kit.

It has to be a '96 to '01 V8 Explorer. Not the '02 and newer, not the V6, not the Expedition.
 

Speedrdr

Contributor
Legend in my own mind
Joined
Nov 27, 2017
Messages
2,028
Loc.
Paris, MS
It will fit. What balance is the stroker kit? There are 3 options, although I typically see the 50 oz-in being pretty common for milder versions as it works with the typical late model stuff. And you need the Explorer damper, witch is the late model 50 oz-in, but can be modified into anything. I once bought a balanced stroker kit, took the damper that came with it and the Explorer to a balance shop and they made the Explorer match perfectly what came with the kit.

It has to be a '96 to '01 V8 Explorer. Not the '02 and newer, not the V6, not the Expedition.
It’s a 50 oz. balancer…I’m fairly certain. Can’t ask the engine builder cause he died a couple of months ago and he had an outside shop balance the rotating mass and I don’t know who it was…and he didn’t put the shop name on the build sheet.
 

ntsqd

heratic car camper
Joined
Jan 30, 2005
Messages
5,953
Loc.
Upper SoKA
FWIW there is a vintage range of Mustang front dress that uses the same timing cover, or one of a very similar design as the water pump gasket is the same. The pump is not, but the gasket is. From looking at one of the Mustang pumps it appears that the main (only?) difference is how the pulley and fan assembly attach to it.
 

Broncobowsher

Total hack
Joined
Jun 4, 2002
Messages
37,068
Most stroker motors are 28 oz…..
I will agree on the 351 based engines.

The 302 stuff, no way would I ever say most. Many were built as 50 so existing performance dampers and flywheels can be reused in mustang applications. Or even reuse stock parts to save money. Or to please people who know there engine is a 50, so they are going to order a 50 oz for there stroker kit. I would say more of a 50/50 mix.
 

PCB 4x4

Contributor
Sponsor/Vendor
Full Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2025
Messages
237
I've been building Mustangs for over 55 years until I got into Bronco's in 2020. Using a clutch is a better way to go for cooling
 

Attachments

  • 20211008_194315.jpg
    20211008_194315.jpg
    233 KB · Views: 95
  • 20200925_190926.jpg
    20200925_190926.jpg
    168.1 KB · Views: 81

Bronco73

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
May 29, 2003
Messages
3,016
Loc.
Cape Coral, FL
I installed an ACp 1970 24" radiator in my 66. I went a step further and opening the radiator support and bent the extra metal inward and made it less like it was a factory installation.

I used the ford contour dual electric fans with auto cool guy controller. I just drove it yesterday with a working AC system and the temp holds steady like it should.

You will have to address the battery because the 24" radiator will hit the battery tray. In my build I made a custom tray with a small high output battery.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_8976.jpeg
    IMG_8976.jpeg
    264.5 KB · Views: 65
  • IMG_6503.jpeg
    IMG_6503.jpeg
    141.6 KB · Views: 66
  • IMG_6501.jpeg
    IMG_6501.jpeg
    159.6 KB · Views: 63
  • IMG_6500.jpeg
    IMG_6500.jpeg
    158.2 KB · Views: 73
  • IMG_6502.jpeg
    IMG_6502.jpeg
    168.7 KB · Views: 58
  • IMG_6470.jpeg
    IMG_6470.jpeg
    179.6 KB · Views: 65
  • IMG_3552.jpeg
    IMG_3552.jpeg
    242 KB · Views: 68
  • IMG_3551.jpeg
    IMG_3551.jpeg
    221.7 KB · Views: 64
  • IMG_3556.jpeg
    IMG_3556.jpeg
    204.8 KB · Views: 64
  • IMG_3550.jpeg
    IMG_3550.jpeg
    199.2 KB · Views: 79
  • 70455697746__9D29C2E7-8B6D-40A8-B7E0-365637337E19.jpeg
    70455697746__9D29C2E7-8B6D-40A8-B7E0-365637337E19.jpeg
    198.6 KB · Views: 87
  • IMG_3553.jpeg
    IMG_3553.jpeg
    196 KB · Views: 72
Top