jamesroney
Sr. Member
Well, let's get geeky...Most Broncos are 1310 however Ford or parts swapping in the past was notorious for slipping in a 1330.
Warning:
Nerdy technical overload data dump ensuing
There is basically no ultimate torque strength between 1310 and 1330, they use the same cup as bearing. However due to the cross being wider on the 1330 it does have a slightly higher continuous torque load over a 1310. In my opinion it is not worth making the switch as an up grade, if you have 1330 parts use them, if you have 1310 use those. If an upgrade is desired go to 1350.
The universal joint has 3 fundamental failure parameters at nominal angle. Continuous Torque, Short Duration Torque, and Minimum Elastic Limit. These are Spicer Dana terms, so I like to use them. (Keep in mind that the Spicer Minimum Elastic Limit includes Brinneling at the needle...which usually happens sooner than failure of the yoke cross.)
joint: Cont: Short: MEL:
1310: 130 - 800 - 1020
1330: 150 - 890 - 1840
1350: 210 - 1240- 2210
units in lb-ft.
So for the 1310 to the 1330:
There is a significant increase in ultimate torque strength
There is a slight increase in continuous torque.
That being said, there is nothing that a 1330 gets you that a 1350 doesn't do better. So if you are paying to upgrade, I am 100% with @Yeller But if you are collecting junkyard parts, it's often easier to find a 1330CV yoke out of a 78-79 Bronco.
I just bought a Flanged 1350 CV shaft for my LJ. Wow. Prices have gone way up. Thanks Brandon.