• Welcome to ClassicBroncos! - You are currently viewing the forums as a GUEST. To take advantage of all the site features, please take a moment to register. It's fast, simple and absolutely free. So please join our community today!
    If you have problems registering or can't log into your account, please contact Admin.

351 rod & main bearing oil clearance

jagbucket

Full Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2013
Messages
251
trying to do final assembly on the 408 stroker but it seems like murphy is still at it . I can only plastic gauge the bearings and i get 0015 rods and 002 on the mains from the general rule of 1 thou per inch of diameter i should be 0021 and 003 min. although a search on this site states that im within spec. not a high rpm build but still want it to last and not burn. what do you guys think and the best way to correct thanks for the help.
 

jsfrv6

Newbie
Joined
Oct 12, 2015
Messages
13
You really need to verify your readings. Maybe take to a shop with the correct tools to check your parts. If still too tight, which the readings you listed are too tight, they make extra clearance bearings for that purpose.. But yea, .001 per inch of diameter is a good starting point. My 408 clearances are .0029-.0032 on a 3" main and .0025-.0026 on the 2.1" rods... Been running good for years on 5W-30 oil.. You gotta get this right!
 
OP
OP
J

jagbucket

Full Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2013
Messages
251
yes its going back monday i don't understand why the machine shop sent it out this way. your numbers sound right and agree with other info i have found via google
 

nvrstuk

Contributor
Just a Bronco driver for over 50 yrs!
Joined
Jul 31, 2001
Messages
9,122
Agree that you should have the shop look at it again...
 

Broncobowsher

Total hack
Joined
Jun 4, 2002
Messages
35,241
The machine shop probably didn't do anything. All new parts (crank and bearings), should be in spec by the manufacturer. Did you ask/pay the shop to blueprint the new parts?

I would also be contacting the manufacturer of your stroker kit and ask what specs they recommend. Don't tell them your specs up front, get what they say they should be first. If they don't match what you have, then bring it to there attention. Not knowing the kit, they may have speced tight clearances for some reason we don't know. But before you send the parts to be reworked, you better check with the supplier of the parts first. Otherwise you might be throwing away any warranty with the parts.
 

Viperwolf1

Contributor
electron whisperer
Joined
Aug 23, 2007
Messages
24,342
Ford's own 351W specs (both rod and main).
-Desired .0008-.0015
-Allowable .0008-.0026

Nothing wrong with your numbers.
 
OP
OP
J

jagbucket

Full Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2013
Messages
251
viper that is the same info i found on searching this site but seems to contradict the .001 per inch of journal diameter perhaps for 6500 and up race motors ? if these Numbers are fine for stock rpms i will be a happy camper. Just trying to clear it up now before final assembly. always reassuring to see higher oil pressure .
the initial job was to send back a motor ready to build and he did charge for "final polish of the crank" also the rods/caps were torqued as though to obtain a measurement .
thanks for the info i can only hope the the shop used the same and is what they intended because it seems to be consistent on all journals
 

Viperwolf1

Contributor
electron whisperer
Joined
Aug 23, 2007
Messages
24,342
Yes, high rpm motors need more clearance for several reasons. A result of that is decreased engine life.
 

B RON CO

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Jun 29, 2016
Messages
2,431
Loc.
Statesville, NC
Hi, I'll give you some info I've learned.
If the torque spec for the rod bolt is 40 - 50 ft.lb, try the plasti gauge at 45 ft.lb.
If the clearance is a little tight, recheck the clearance at 40 ft.lb.
You may find out there is good clearance.
Good luck
 

pcf_mark

Bronco Guru
Joined
Jun 11, 2010
Messages
3,609
Those tolerances are solid for a street engine. It will have amazing oil pressure (as long as the rod side clearance are in spec .015-.020).
 
OP
OP
J

jagbucket

Full Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2013
Messages
251
Yeah l did not tear it down yet pending a call to the shop monday. I'm starting to feel better about the specs. Also checking with torque at 42.5 on rods.
The build has always been for heathly street trail rig. Just wasn't expecting such a difference in bearing clearance based on end use. To be fair I've never built anything but stock motors and depended on a machine shop to set clearances to stock . this one with all forged aftermaket parts has me questioning every part I've already had to buy two sets of rods and custom order pistions so the only part from the kit I kept was the crank, now I'm questioning that.
In retro I wish I had bought from local venders. easier contact exchange if needed
 

73azbronco

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Messages
8,013
also when doing plastigauge really make sure all the parts are clean dry zero oil front and back.
 
OP
OP
J

jagbucket

Full Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2013
Messages
251
just got back from machinists to have an accurate measurement and its at .0022 for rods and the mains are averaging .002 . i guess the only thing plastic can tell is if you need to check further. for peace of mind im glad to have it checked out.
 

Blue Bastard

Bronco Guru
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
2,161
Peace of mind is a comfortable feeling! Glad it was good to go.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

nvrstuk

Contributor
Just a Bronco driver for over 50 yrs!
Joined
Jul 31, 2001
Messages
9,122
Great, that's why it was good to have the shop look at it again...otherwise you would always be guessing and worrying about it. Now you're good to go...
 
Top