• Welcome to ClassicBroncos! - You are currently viewing the forums as a GUEST. To take advantage of all the site features, please take a moment to register. It's fast, simple and absolutely free. So please join our community today!
    If you have problems registering or can't log into your account, please contact Admin.

351w Fuel Injection Conversion

kman67

Contributor
Full Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2005
Messages
178
Loc.
Aptos
I'll be curious if you can get the Explorer fuel rail to work with the distributor on the 351W. I had an interference fit on mine (5.0) and had to keep running the Mustang rails. It seems to be a common problem based on a number of posts on the interwebs.

Todd Z.

I just went out and test fit my motorcraft dizzy on my Edelbrock 3880 (now replaced by 3884) intake with the Explorer rails. There seems to be plenty of room, maybe because the 5.8 is wider? In my picks I used a heater tube from a 86-93 mustang as the explorer tube put the coolant temp sensor hitting the intake. I did bend the heater tube to water pump down a bit as it’s meant for the 5.0. I’m also using the Explorer front dress with the Saginaw bracket from wild horses like you, without the AC pump.
f0efb188b2aa2da2b719e6a844a9efde.jpg

0c8604670682f43baf68a6fce3a3fba4.jpg

3eacf6a0c4111074bc15ab29093afb1b.jpg

23728835a1ec984cbce43b464b0fc21d.jpg

a8cab766b83bf6eeb248bebd90f0972e.jpg

6a3be918f25d2b1188fa9de5510f616c.jpg

6239d083a6c690a5a89fa4d842b30b33.jpg

6239d083a6c690a5a89fa4d842b30b33.jpg

Kyle


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

toddz69

Sponsor/Vendor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Nov 28, 2001
Messages
11,213
Thanks for the detailed pics! Definitely looks like it's a 5.0 vs. 5.8 thing. You've got miles of room.

Todd Z.
 

Timmy390

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Jan 1, 2011
Messages
5,948
Loc.
Conway, AR
I like that rails fuel pressure port location. The van and F150 5.8L has the port on the D side and it's VERY VERY hard to get to (if at all) when using the Explorer upper.

I might have to look at upgrading

Tim
 

ntsqd

heratic car camper
Joined
Jan 30, 2005
Messages
5,953
Loc.
Upper SoKA
This what my '96 FSB looks like, memory says that the supply and return connections are sort of behind the DS cylinder head, but I'll need to look to confirm that:
i-tGBJnsZ-L.jpg

Other than being "way over there" I don't recall access being all that difficult. The 1996's are unicorns in other systems, could this be yet another one?
 

lars

Contributor
Been here awhile
Joined
Jun 29, 2001
Messages
3,333
Loc.
NorCal flatlands
I just went out and test fit my motorcraft dizzy on my Edelbrock 3880 (now replaced by 3884) intake with the Explorer rails. There seems to be plenty of room, maybe because the 5.8 is wider? In my picks I used a heater tube from a 86-93 mustang as the explorer tube put the coolant temp sensor hitting the intake. I did bend the heater tube to water pump down a bit as it’s meant for the 5.0. I’m also using the Explorer front dress with the Saginaw bracket from wild horses like you, without the AC pump.
Kyle, do you have a pic of the firewall end of your engine? Curious about your valve covers, where is the PCV port and oil filler tube? My fuel rail looks like that but I had to lengthen the hoses to get it to span the lower intake.
 
OP
OP
1969

1969

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Feb 28, 2022
Messages
1,086
Loc.
Reno, NV
Thanks everyone for the great information!

Any thoughts on the Explorer return less fuel rails?
 

kman67

Contributor
Full Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2005
Messages
178
Loc.
Aptos
Kyle, do you have a pic of the firewall end of your engine? Curious about your valve covers, where is the PCV port and oil filler tube? My fuel rail looks like that but I had to lengthen the hoses to get it to span the lower intake.

I also had to use longer fuel injection hose to span the left and right side as the 5.8 is wider. My PCV is at the driver rear valve cover and the fill is at the passenger side valve cover. I plugged the stock PCV
027fb75242143a573f8a75ca83c9d882.jpg

hole at the rear of the intake.
c0c42edf84c9642d22f747bac675ddda.jpg

98f0afe479c28290b5a68364a1eda750.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

399strokerEB

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Jun 23, 2010
Messages
1,715
Loc.
Wasilla, AK
I have been going back and forth about what rails to use. I am going to use whatever fits the best based on the feedback here and what info I can find online.

I’ll update my first post accordingly
I'm just using stock bronco/truck fuel rails. I can get pictures later if you need them.
 

lars

Contributor
Been here awhile
Joined
Jun 29, 2001
Messages
3,333
Loc.
NorCal flatlands
I also had to use longer fuel injection hose to span the left and right side as the 5.8 is wider. My PCV is at the driver rear valve cover and the fill is at the passenger side valve cover. I plugged the stock PCV
hole at the rear of the intake.

Thanks, looks great! Your fuel rail setup is the same as mine. I'm still using the PCV port at the base of my lower (Trick Flow) intake but comments here have gotten me to thinking about abandoning it and going with the plumbing like you and @Timmy390 have. My engine burns a lot of oil but it doesn't seem to be affecting the plugs, and the intake is getting nasty already. Guessing my engine is vacuuming up oil through the PCV also. What oil filler are you using with those valve covers?
 

kman67

Contributor
Full Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2005
Messages
178
Loc.
Aptos
Thanks, looks great! Your fuel rail setup is the same as mine. I'm still using the PCV port at the base of my lower (Trick Flow) intake but comments here have gotten me to thinking about abandoning it and going with the plumbing like you and @Timmy390 have. My engine burns a lot of oil but it doesn't seem to be affecting the plugs, and the intake is getting nasty already. Guessing my engine is vacuuming up oil through the PCV also. What oil filler are you using with those valve covers?

I’m using just a generic cap(Mr Gasket) with a port that goes to the throttle body to keep the system closed.
884a0451721766734808c828f12d6cbf.jpg

4522b06edba2a7f867d233684177229d.jpg

753f94ddc7473c8cbfa40016ae361513.jpg

Kyle


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

roundhouse

Bronco Guru
Joined
Sep 5, 2003
Messages
2,956
Good info here

I have a 351w roller engine from a 96 van

One owner about 100k on the van
 

Broncobowsher

Total hack
Joined
Jun 4, 2002
Messages
37,077
FYI, that heater hose will not survive long term with the oils. It will either get really soft and gooey or hard as a rock. Should bet a couple years out of it, but the rubber in them is for coolant, not hydrocarbons. Not a fix today issue, but just be aware of it long term.
 

kman67

Contributor
Full Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2005
Messages
178
Loc.
Aptos
FYI, that heater hose will not survive long term with the oils. It will either get really soft and gooey or hard as a rock. Should bet a couple years out of it, but the rubber in them is for coolant, not hydrocarbons. Not a fix today issue, but just be aware of it long term.
I noticed that when I took the pic. It's been in place for about 10 years and is getting hard. I would like to find a filler cap that has a 3/8" outlet that matches the throttle body inlet. And then get a 3/8" hose that is oil compliant.
 

mdainsd

Contributor
Full Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2025
Messages
263
Loc.
San Diego
Thank you. The motor I got came with the Holley Terminator X on a tall ram, but that setup is about 6" too tall. I wanted the EFI, but the easy way forward is a low rise with a carb...
 

roundhouse

Bronco Guru
Joined
Sep 5, 2003
Messages
2,956
Thank you. The motor I got came with the Holley Terminator X on a tall ram, but that setup is about 6" too tall. I wanted the EFI, but the easy way forward is a low rise with a carb...
The manifold from a 74 ish van will fit with the atock
Bronco air cleaner but the van manifold are all for
Two
Barrel carbs
 
Top