Thanks guys for the comments.. I am still trying to decide on the design.. I am thinking if I make the lower part of the radius arm one solid piece and then the upper one angle back into it.. There are draw backs to both designs as far as clearance etc.. I had thought about like someone said above, make the upper bar one piece and have the lower parallel for a few inches then have a 45 in it up to the other tube and plate between them.. with the tubing I am using as a mock up, that is fine, but when I get the 1/4 wall DOM I won't be able to bend it
So I am trying to plan my designs using straight tubing.. And if you notice you really only gain a few "s with the upper bar solid. Also if the lower bar is solid then it will hit rocks etc, but that will protect the engine, drive shaft etc. from damage... and with it being thick I should never hurt it.. To many decisions, I may just say screw it and start building..
For flex of the stock bushings I am not planning to get any flex there, I figure the Heim's will give all of the flex I need.. From what I have seen wristing really helps when you have the stock radius arm set up where the rear of the bar is binding?? The heim joint set up should cure that..
I have also thought about building some way for one of the bars to be adjustable for pinion angle.. but then again once it is right I shouldn't be needing to adjust it..
I am leaning toward the design under the Radius Arm Test 1 pics, where the lower bar is solid and the upper angles into it....