bigpappa said:
Now that you have it all finished and the way you want it. If you had it to do all over again would you? If so would you do anything differently? What did you finally end up with as far as gearing from the engine back? What RPM are you running at hwy speeds say 65 - 75? With the torque of the engine you do not need as low of a crawl ratio right? So if I were running a 70-80:1 with a cummins would that be safe to say it is in the ball park performance wise as a 351W with a 100:1 or there about?
I know it is a bunch of questions and some assumptions on my part. (and yes I know what it means to ASS U ME) ;D I am still debating on which way to go though. %)
Thanks,
Kris
Your question is really a double edged sword for me. I have never been more happy with my Bronco than how it is right now. However, it is the thrill of the build that keeps me in this hobby; not necessarily the wheeling part of it. I enjoy sifting through new problems and venturing into the "project". The Cummins experiment was awesome and if I were to build another multi-purpose Bronco, I would build it to the exact specs I have now with one exception; I would have gone with full width axles.
My rpm's are right at 2,000 at 70 mph. I'm running 4:10 gears with 35x12.5x15 BFG M/T's on 15x8" Mickey Thompson Classic II's.
I'm not sure, but it sounds like your crawl ratio question boils down to, "Was the Atlas worth the expense?" Yes, it was. I just came to realize that this last week. I do prefer really low crawl speeds because they give me control and time to pick the right line. Since my offroad driving skills suck, I need all the help I can get! Also, there is less need to use the clutch. I don't use mine at all when in low range. It is next to impossible to stall the 4BT so I just use the brake and throttle to contol my speed. The clutch is only for stopping and starting. In addition to the crawl ratio, there is the fact that the rear output shaft on the D20 is subject to failure. I'm not saying it is destined to fail so all you guys that are running one with no problems don't jump me for that comment. But, I have twisted a rear output shaft; with a 5.0. The 4BT would be merciless on that weak link if you ever bind up your drivetrain on the trail. For that reason alone, the Atlas was worth the investment.
The power of the 4BT really does not factor in much with crawl ratio believe it or not. Yes, it is true that I generate around 450# of torque at only 1300 rpm, but that is in high range with the engine under a load and generating boost. When the Bronco is in low range, the gearing decreases the load and the torque only get's to about 250-300 pounds at 1300 rpm (according to Rocky Mountain Cummins). I'm not sure what the 351 specs are, but under the same low speed/ low range conditions I bet they are pretty similar.
Now it's time for another project. I'm picking up a sweet ass 1981 Mercedes 380SEL with a cracked head for $500. I've been wanting to squeeze a 351 EFI into something for a while now. I may just have to go molest this thing. I think a 350 horse 4-door 380SEL with a Borla exhaust note would be sweet.
I'm just twisted that way. Ask me about our 1967 VW bus/truck with a Toronado 455ci FWD drivetrain mounted mid-ship in it. That one sure turned heads. ;D
Jim