marko said:
Thanks for the input, but my carb and manifold added almost 40HP coupled with the 2 1/2 inch exhaust I put on the Bronco.
You seem very anti-header. Why is that?
THanks Asark, and naz , but I can answer for myself,
I have had many , many sets of headers on diff rigs, I just never thought that they were worth the money and time . So I researched some , no a lot of data. If you would like I can post it for you.
Headers are a scam. Untill the last few months ,Nobody would post the truth. 3% increase is all you get. So If you started with a stock 69 and you have run yours on a Dyno to get the 40HP increase, You would get. Badabing badaboom.
11 hP?
Everybody, and I mean everybody post , HEADERS ARE one cheep way to get great HP.11 HP is Not worth the hassle, the reduced room and the Price of Headers and the welding on of reducers.
Over the past bunch of months , I have taken a lot of shit for my stance, and I have welcomed it, because there are too many people that are involved with the sale of headers , the promotion of headers, but not enough independant studies. But now there are three independant studies that have proven my original information that I found in some tech books a few years back.
Broncobowsher ,has done his homework, and shown that the prob is the matching of the ports , anybody with a set of ole header gaskets can tell you that theirs don't match up.
My whole contention, IS that they are a waste of money on anything but a track only rig, K -code manifolds would be a different story.
I am seeing this silly education of the Eb owner, Take the long way around the barn , buy a carb, intake and header combo. Then get Smart later and get a differant head setup and raise the comp ratio and change the CAM.
WHy not do that first, there is a bigger increase in power? In many cases 30%.
Ok, I drive fo a living, 500 miles a day, the boss sets the computor 3% less for the Day, I can't feel it!