That is certainly the theory that I always operated with, too. But there may be a couple of other variables that are at play.
I run a fairly lean set of jets to cover the altitude range from 5000 ft to 10,000ft. The off-idle acceleration has always been spot on. I once had to replace a powervalve when the vacuum diapraghm died. The accelerator pump squirt was good and healthy, and the float levels and seats were good and new. Stupidly I threw away the old powervalve before recording what number it was. I mean, the powervalve is a powervalve. How much effect could it have, right? Using the rule of thumb that a the correct powervalve should be numerically half the measured engine vacuum, I got one a on the low end of the spectrum.
The results were horrific. Pressing the accelerator resulted in a flame-out bog. I mean a big bog. So to test a theory I started installing progressively higher powervalves. 6.5 was good but there was a definitely little stumble on acceleration while driving down the street. Then an 8.5 seemed to fix most of that, but there was still a small stutter in there. With a vacuum of 16 in/Hg that should have more than done it. But maybe the altitude? Don't know. Then to continue the experiment I swapped in a 10.5 and the Action Bronco got its mojo back. 10.5 is way up there.
So, yes, the powervalve should not have that big an effect, but there it is. Maybe the annular discharge ventures on the 4100 empty out the fuel well faster than most carbs. Maybe the lean jets can't supply enough gas and the accelerator pump can't cover that. Whatever the mix of variables, the powervalve tuning did the trick and having one too small definitely affected the off idle behavior. Just sayin'.