• Welcome to ClassicBroncos! - You are currently viewing the forums as a GUEST. To take advantage of all the site features, please take a moment to register. It's fast, simple and absolutely free. So please join our community today!
    If you have problems registering or can't log into your account, please contact Admin.

pitman HELP-update

bronko69er

EB Addict
Joined
Oct 16, 2006
Messages
4,599
Loc.
Renton, WA
I think you need a longer pitman arm as well.
Does it feel kind of hard to steer?
I'd start looking for one a little longer.

I still dont see why I need a longer arm?

This doesn't make sence to me either.
Wouldn't a longer pitman arm make it harder to steer?
Torque = Force X Distance,
If the required force (to move the draglink) stays the same, and the distance from the shaft increases (longer pitman arm), the torque required to turn the shaft increases.
 
OP
OP
kntr

kntr

Bronco Guru
Joined
Oct 7, 2006
Messages
2,277
Does every thing look good to go? Angles and such?
 

bronko69er

EB Addict
Joined
Oct 16, 2006
Messages
4,599
Loc.
Renton, WA
Nothing jumps out at me as way off.
Obviously the angle is not perfect and the lengths are not super close but it looks close enough and if it drives fine then great!
The ideal situation is to have them the same length and paralell but that is not always possible. In order to get enough angular travel out of the lower joint on the drag link, it typically needs to be placed out near end of the tie rod. Since you can't put the trac bar out near the end of the axle, the ideal setup cannot be achieved when increaed angular travel of the lower drig link joint is required. So there are small compromises we make to each of the variables to minimize the differences in lenght and angles.
 

broncoguy66

New Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2006
Messages
27
Well, I've got the toyoda setup, and with the Chevy tierod ends on my 3.5" lift I don't have much of a problem at all. It's starting to loosen up but I think that's just things wearing out. People thought that once you reamed out the yoda box for the chevy end there wouldn't be anything left. I haven't had it break yet. The cheby rod ends are wearing out before the arm has broken.
 

welndmn

Bronco Guru
Joined
Nov 12, 2001
Messages
2,112
This doesn't make sence to me either.
Wouldn't a longer pitman arm make it harder to steer?
Torque = Force X Distance,
If the required force (to move the draglink) stays the same, and the distance from the shaft increases (longer pitman arm), the torque required to turn the shaft increases.

You have the right thinking, just on the wrong plane, think of it from the drag link area.
With the drag link angled out that far, you loose some steering force and steering travel.
The reason I asked if when I had that setup, i noticed it harder to steer and less travel.
If you don't notice it, then don't mess with it ;D
 

bronko69er

EB Addict
Joined
Oct 16, 2006
Messages
4,599
Loc.
Renton, WA
You have the right thinking, just on the wrong plane, think of it from the drag link area.
With the drag link angled out that far, you loose some steering force and steering travel.
The reason I asked if when I had that setup, i noticed it harder to steer and less travel.
If you don't notice it, then don't mess with it ;D

Ok, I see where you're comming from.
Excuse the math while I prove it to myself.

Assumptions:
The drag link is paralell to the groud (just for calculation purposes) since in both cases the drag link angle with respect to the ground is almos the same, we can assume it's zero.
Ideal drag link angle of 5 degrees (in front of the tie rod).
Drag link length is 36" (for calculation purposes).
New drag link angle (with a shorter pitman arm) 15 deg (in front of the tie rod).

With a 36" drag link @ 5*, the force in the drag link is .4% greater than the force in the tierod.

With a 36" drag link @ 15*, the force in the drag link is 3.4% greatet than the force in the tierod.

A force differential of 3%...... OK so there is a small difference.
 
Top