Rymadd
Sr. Member
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2013
- Messages
- 470
Just had a couple questions that I can't seem to find answers for easily online. I currently have an 80s ford 9 out of a f150 in my bronco. I am wanting to build another rear end with a truss, different gears, and some other stuff while driving on this one. Looking for the same "full width".
Long story short I want to keep the 31 spline equal length axles that came in f150s I think it is 1973-1986 are all that width 65.25"? My question is about the wheel bearings. I have always seen the ball bearings on ford 9s, but the one I got out under my truck now has tapered needle bearings. They seem like a pain in the ass since you have to press a race into the axle housing, and also have that collar pressed onto the shaft.
When did they switch? Can you get a 65.25 width housing with the older style ball bearings? Which style is better? What are they called because I can't find any info on them!
I think the ball bearing style are a lot easier to change out, but if the tapered needle bearing style are better then I might stick with them. I have a feeling there is a reason why they went to that style in the 1/2 ton full size trucks!
Thanks!
Long story short I want to keep the 31 spline equal length axles that came in f150s I think it is 1973-1986 are all that width 65.25"? My question is about the wheel bearings. I have always seen the ball bearings on ford 9s, but the one I got out under my truck now has tapered needle bearings. They seem like a pain in the ass since you have to press a race into the axle housing, and also have that collar pressed onto the shaft.
When did they switch? Can you get a 65.25 width housing with the older style ball bearings? Which style is better? What are they called because I can't find any info on them!
I think the ball bearing style are a lot easier to change out, but if the tapered needle bearing style are better then I might stick with them. I have a feeling there is a reason why they went to that style in the 1/2 ton full size trucks!
Thanks!