• Welcome to ClassicBroncos! - You are currently viewing the forums as a GUEST. To take advantage of all the site features, please take a moment to register. It's fast, simple and absolutely free. So please join our community today!
    If you have problems registering or can't log into your account, please contact Admin.

Has anyone seen a brass fuel sender foat split before?

MarsChariot

Contributor
Planetary Offroader
Joined
Oct 12, 2004
Messages
2,605
Loc.
Albuquerque, New Mexico
The main tank fuel gauge quit reading a year or so ago so I finally investigated. This was a new sender installed during the restoration ten years ago. When I pulled the float out I saw fuel draining out of it, so I expected some sort of pin holes in the float. But instead I saw this. The float was split. We are use to those plastic floats doing this but now the brass floats do it too?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6801.jpeg
    IMG_6801.jpeg
    291.1 KB · Views: 100

DirtDonk

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Nov 3, 2003
Messages
51,616
Seen it before, a long time ago. But it was on a particularly ancient example!
It's probably the combination of modern fuel blends, with crappy off-shore quality parts.
Heck, for all we know it's not even real brass!
But yeah, even if you take into account possible water contamination, that's a very short lifespan for that part. At this point, plastic might be the better choice. Except that, by now, very likely the plastic is not modern fuel compatible either!

Paul
 

DirtDonk

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Nov 3, 2003
Messages
51,616
But hey, this is a great opportunity to test any new sending unit you might have, before you install it.
Hmm, did the old one read correctly? If so, it might be a keeper and maybe you can scavenge a really old brass float from another old unit.

Paul
 

ntsqd

heratic car camper
Joined
Jan 30, 2005
Messages
5,953
Loc.
Upper SoKA
I've seen several float bowl floats do that. Grandad used to just dry them out and then solder them shut.
 

bmc69

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Jun 11, 2004
Messages
12,015
Quite often. Brass embrittlement is always an issue but is significantly accelerated by the presence of any water or by ethanol fuel in general. Same issue with the brass components in the Motorcraft carbs; the emulsion tubes in particular.
 
OP
OP
MarsChariot

MarsChariot

Contributor
Planetary Offroader
Joined
Oct 12, 2004
Messages
2,605
Loc.
Albuquerque, New Mexico
I dug out my original sender and got the somewhat more robust brass float off it and replaced the thin one on the new sender with that. The new sender appeared to have the same style float as the one I showed above. We will see what happens. Meanwhile, maybe certain solid foam floats are better. But there is a version that is hybrid that some vendors are selling and I had one in the aux tank on the 76 for a couple of years. It didn't do too well either. Maybe it still floated, but it looked like it was on its way to a bad end. Check it out.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6805.jpeg
    IMG_6805.jpeg
    322.2 KB · Views: 74

Broncobowsher

Total hack
Joined
Jun 4, 2002
Messages
37,063
The solid ones (in carbs anyway) have been known to absorb gas and sink. Modern fuel issues.
None are perfect.

Be sure to write "Titanic" on the side of the float. Just to make sure it is unsinkable.
 
Top