• Welcome to ClassicBroncos! - You are currently viewing the forums as a GUEST. To take advantage of all the site features, please take a moment to register. It's fast, simple and absolutely free. So please join our community today!
    If you have problems registering or can't log into your account, please contact Admin.

5.8L differences F150, F250, E series ?

Timmy390

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Jan 1, 2011
Messages
5,747
Loc.
Conway, AR
I've read the F250 and E series are lower compression. Is that the only difference? How is that lower compression accomplished? Different pistons?

I found a 96 E350 van with a good 5.8L. The van is running and driving but it's beat up so no real value. Dude is asking $850 for the whole thing.

Anyone know if the front dress will fit in the Bronco?

Tim
 

77RHINO

Full Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2011
Messages
308
I am working on a roller 351 from a 96 bronco, and I have a co-worker that is helping me address these issues with mine. So far he has narrowed it down to pistons and gasket thicknesses to reach the ideal quench height for the chamber. Im sure there is more but we havent gotten deep enough into it yet. I believe I will be going with the Keith Black flat tops with valve reliefs to adjust compression. As far as front dress, I am using most of my 302 stuff to keep it simple and affordable, or at least thats the plan! HTH
 
OP
OP
Timmy390

Timmy390

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Jan 1, 2011
Messages
5,747
Loc.
Conway, AR
I was hoping it was only gasket thickness.

I can't find much info on the 96 E series 351W's
I found this but don't now that it's correct.
HP 210
Torque 310
Bore 4.00
Stroke 3.50
Compression 8.8:1

Tim
 

Mountain Ram

Contributor
Recovering Masshole
Joined
May 8, 2011
Messages
3,387
Loc.
Abingdon, VA
Compression is directly related to head volume, piston type, block deck height and gasket thickness. The style of piston and the head volume typically make the biggest changes in compression. Some engines have dished pistons, some flat top and other domed (ex. high compression race engines). When you look at heads, they vary widely 50-70ccs and all of this changes with head machining as well as block machining.
 
OP
OP
Timmy390

Timmy390

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Jan 1, 2011
Messages
5,747
Loc.
Conway, AR
Compression is directly related to head volume, piston type, block deck height and gasket thickness. The style of piston and the head volume typically make the biggest changes in compression. Some engines have dished pistons, some flat top and other domed (ex. high compression race engines). When you look at heads, they vary widely 50-70ccs and all of this changes with head machining as well as block machining.

Understand but looking for specifics on the E series and HD series motors if I can get it. If it's just heads and gaskets then I'm all good as I can get a set easy. If it's pistons then it ups the difficulty scale.

Trying to figure out if it's worth my wild to get the E350 or not.

Tim
 

Viperwolf1

Contributor
electron whisperer
Joined
Aug 23, 2007
Messages
24,345
I was hoping it was only gasket thickness.

I can't find much info on the 96 E series 351W's
I found this but don't now that it's correct.
HP 210
Torque 310
Bore 4.00
Stroke 3.50
Compression 8.8:1

Tim
This looks correct. 8.8:1 with 65 cc heads. The pistons are hyperutectic with metric rings. They have about a 18 cc dish. Pin height is different than pre-94 351w pistons. Rod length is probably different also.
 

Attachments

  • uploadfromtaptalk1418927162762.jpg
    uploadfromtaptalk1418927162762.jpg
    57.4 KB · Views: 28
  • uploadfromtaptalk1418927248760.jpg
    uploadfromtaptalk1418927248760.jpg
    60.2 KB · Views: 31
OP
OP
Timmy390

Timmy390

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Jan 1, 2011
Messages
5,747
Loc.
Conway, AR
This looks correct. 8.8:1 with 65 cc heads. The pistons are hyperutectic with metric rings. They have about a 18 cc dish. Pin height is different than pre-94 351w pistons. Rod length is probably different also.

Thanks Viperwolf1

So a set of GT-40p heads with 58-61cc chamber volume should boost the compression up a bit closer to what the F-150 motors have.

No issues with running the P heads on the HD series motors?

Tim
 

Broncobowsher

Total hack
Joined
Jun 4, 2002
Messages
35,634
At one time the F150 and Bronco were 8.8:1 compression and F250/350 were 8.3:1 compression. But I have also seen a lot that shows them all at 8.8:1 compression, especially in the later 90s.
 

ScanmanSteven

Bronco Guru
Joined
Dec 19, 2010
Messages
1,129
P series GT40's will work on any small block 302-351, only issue is the exhaust with the angled plugs.
 

Viperwolf1

Contributor
electron whisperer
Joined
Aug 23, 2007
Messages
24,345
Thanks Viperwolf1

So a set of GT-40p heads with 58-61cc chamber volume should boost the compression up a bit closer to what the F-150 motors have.

No issues with running the P heads on the HD series motors?

Tim

59cc should get you right around 9.2:1. You might have to drill out the head bolt holes and then there's the spark plug clearance issues with the GT40P's.
 
OP
OP
Timmy390

Timmy390

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Jan 1, 2011
Messages
5,747
Loc.
Conway, AR
59cc should get you right around 9.2:1. You might have to drill out the head bolt holes and then there's the spark plug clearance issues with the GT40P's.

Yes they will need to be drilled. The clearance issues are with the exhaust and plug wire boots right? Not inside the chamber?

Tim
 
OP
OP
Timmy390

Timmy390

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Jan 1, 2011
Messages
5,747
Loc.
Conway, AR
Thanks for all the info guys

Well it sounds like I need to just go offer the dude $500 for the van, strip what I need, try and sell the trans and a few other parts and take the rest to the crusher. Heck I might make money....

Tim
 
OP
OP
Timmy390

Timmy390

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Jan 1, 2011
Messages
5,747
Loc.
Conway, AR
Looked at the van today. Motor is good with the exception of a leaky oil pan gasket. The digital odometer isn't working so don't know the mileage but figure just on the age it's got 100K plus on it. Starts right up no knocks or pings. Rev's freely and all the accessories on the motor work.

Dude will not take less than $825. My guess is it weighs 5K plus pounds so removing the motor and trans should put me about 4K. Going to see how much that will bring me at the crusher. Not sure what the going rate is.....maybe 10 cents a pound?

Are E4OD's worth anything?

Tim
 

Bluebolt

Full Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2014
Messages
351
Loc.
Benton LA
351w

Looked at the van today. Motor is good with the exception of a leaky oil pan gasket. The digital odometer isn't working so don't know the mileage but figure just on the age it's got 100K plus on it. Starts right up no knocks or pings. Rev's freely and all the accessories on the motor work.

Dude will not take less than $825. My guess is it weighs 5K plus pounds so removing the motor and trans should put me about 4K. Going to see how much that will bring me at the crusher. Not sure what the going rate is.....maybe 10 cents a pound?

Are E4OD's worth anything?

Tim

The 96 351W has OBDII and has some unique parts. Are you staying fuel injection? It will have a roller cam. It will also have a Saginaw steering pump, a good thing!
The front dress is tight in the early Bronco but will fit according to others. It's the same length as 87-93 Mustang 5.0. It will have a 3G alternator probably a 90 amp another good thing.

Scrap varies by area, you will have to call local ones. It's about $6 for a hundred pounds for a car around here right now.

If the transmission works good try to sell it before you remove it so they can test drive it and tell them no returns!
 
OP
OP
Timmy390

Timmy390

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Jan 1, 2011
Messages
5,747
Loc.
Conway, AR
The 96 351W has OBDII and has some unique parts. Are you staying fuel injection? It will have a roller cam. It will also have a Saginaw steering pump, a good thing!
The front dress is tight in the early Bronco but will fit according to others. It's the same length as 87-93 Mustang 5.0. It will have a 3G alternator probably a 90 amp another good thing.

Scrap varies by area, you will have to call local ones. It's about $6 for a hundred pounds for a car around here right now.

If the transmission works good try to sell it before you remove it so they can test drive it and tell them no returns!

$6 per 100 gets me $240. I would sure like to be in the 3-$400 range. Still at $6 that puts me in this thing $585 I don't think that's too bad for a running roller 351w with all the front dress. I'll be calling around on Monday for sure.

Good call on the trans. I didn't think about that.

Yeah, ODBII's first year as I recall. Going to go EFI at some point. Considering the TBI setups that bolt onto a dual plane intake but will go carb first. Thinking of running a ProComp HEI distributor. I hear good thing and bad. I hear the same about MSD stuff but I've never had any issues with my MSD setup on my Mach 1.

I'm counting on the front dress fitting and getting the benefits of the serp setup and the upgraded alt and PS pump.

Tim
 

Bluebolt

Full Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2014
Messages
351
Loc.
Benton LA
Since it's a E350 it might be a bit more than 5000 pounds stock. Cargo van or passenger? 138" wheelbase or longer?
 
OP
OP
Timmy390

Timmy390

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Jan 1, 2011
Messages
5,747
Loc.
Conway, AR
Since it's a E350 it might be a bit more than 5000 pounds stock. Cargo van or passenger? 138" wheelbase or longer?

Passenger 138 with the seats removed and some interior panels missing. Think the door sticker said 5400 and change.....so 4K pounds with motor and tranny removed might be slightly on the low side. 4500 plus is what I'm hoping it weighs out to be.

Tim
 
Top