• Welcome to ClassicBroncos! - You are currently viewing the forums as a GUEST. To take advantage of all the site features, please take a moment to register. It's fast, simple and absolutely free. So please join our community today!
    If you have problems registering or can't log into your account, please contact Admin.

Dana 20 to c4

Daveyd

Jr. Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2014
Messages
71
Loc.
Orange County
Hi all, I’m trying to get my bronco back together but I’ll be putting a c4 in instead of the stick. I also have a 302 with an aod already on it but for some reason I’m deciding not to use it mostly because I don’t want to cut up a nice original body. Anyway, I have a Dana 20 that seems to be correct for it(a68) and the c4 seems to be missing something. How can I tell? Thanks in advance
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7607.jpeg
    IMG_7607.jpeg
    238.4 KB · Views: 116
  • IMG_7605.jpeg
    IMG_7605.jpeg
    301 KB · Views: 114
  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    247.4 KB · Views: 124
Last edited:

jeffncs

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
May 4, 2004
Messages
1,897
Loc.
Raleigh, NC
That’s everything…. The intermediate is still attached to the trans. after doing a thorough(!!!!) cleaning of the input and housing, move the intermediate to the D20. It’s easier to assemble in that order.
 

thegreatjustino

Contributor
Red Head Grease Monkey
Joined
Jan 23, 2002
Messages
16,285
Loc.
Stockton, CA
That’s everything…. The intermediate is still attached to the trans. after doing a thorough(!!!!) cleaning of the input and housing, move the intermediate to the D20. It’s easier to assemble in that order.

If that Dana 20 is from a 1968 as stated, the spud shaft is likely for a manual transmission and will be too long to use in the C4 adapter. The OP will need the correct length C4 spud shaft.

There's been some discussion here over the years regarding shortening a manual spud shaft the correct amount to work, but doing so brings up whether or not the splines in the shaft are deep enough for proper engagement to the transmission output shaft.
 

jeffncs

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
May 4, 2004
Messages
1,897
Loc.
Raleigh, NC
If that Dana 20 is from a 1968 as stated, the spud shaft is likely for a manual transmission and will be too long to use in the C4 adapter. The OP will need the correct length C4 spud shaft.

There's been some discussion here over the years regarding shortening a manual spud shaft the correct amount to work, but doing so brings up whether or not the splines in the shaft are deep enough for proper engagement to the transmission output shaft.

From the pics, the pieces are all there. Only way to tell is to see if it’ll all bolt together….
 

Broncobowsher

Total hack
Joined
Jun 4, 2002
Messages
37,077
If that D20 was on an AOD (not sure from the wording of the post) the spline count is probably wrong. The aftermarket AOD spline count is 27 instead of the normal Bronco 28.
 

Viperwolf1

Contributor
electron whisperer
Joined
Aug 23, 2007
Messages
24,448
That bearing retainer is really odd. Never seen one like that. It bolts to the tcase. You have something strange going on there. Input stub shaft looks odd too.
 

Attachments

  • Bronco 006.jpg
    Bronco 006.jpg
    142.3 KB · Views: 61
  • Bronco%20307.jpg
    Bronco%20307.jpg
    54.2 KB · Views: 64

bronco italiano

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Feb 1, 2004
Messages
2,593
That bearing retainer is really odd. Never seen one like that. It bolts to the tcase. You have something strange going on there. Input stub shaft looks odd too.
Yes indeed. Something doesn't seem right with that T-Case
 

Broncobowsher

Total hack
Joined
Jun 4, 2002
Messages
37,077
From the rustly look of the tailhousing extension, does it have "STROPPE" cast in the side of it?
The only adapters I know of that were cast iron were the Stoppe conversion of the early 70s.
 

Oldtimer

Contributor
Jr. Member with Sr. moments
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Messages
1,796
Loc.
Sunnyvale, CA
1780548021512.png


V8 RAN T-case adaptor housing is 9-3/8"
V8 RAT T-case adaptor housing is 8-7/8"
V8 C4 T-case adaptor housing is 7-1/2"
I6 RAN T-case adaptor housing is 6-1/2"

I6 MT output shaft is 3” shorter than the V8 MT output shaft

RAN has 2.99 1st
RAT has 3.41 1st
RAN tranny is 1/2” shorter than RAT

I6 & V8 MT use same adapter input shaft, 7-31/32 long
V8 AT uses unique adapter input shaft approximately 5/8” shorter
 

Viperwolf1

Contributor
electron whisperer
Joined
Aug 23, 2007
Messages
24,448
From the rustly look of the tailhousing extension, does it have "STROPPE" cast in the side of it?
The only adapters I know of that were cast iron were the Stoppe conversion of the early 70s.
The Ford C4 adapters were also cast iron.

In any case, I don't think that C4 was mated to that D20 previously. Notice the pin in the bearing retainer and the pin in the C4 adapter.
 

widowmaker77

Contributor
Sr. Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2007
Messages
564
That bearing retainer is really odd. Never seen one like that. It bolts to the tcase. You have something strange going on there. Input stub shaft looks odd too.
I’m trying to wrap
My head around how this thing bolts up to a transmission. Where tail shaft housing bolts to the case, there’s already a like a retainer plate bolted there. In the pic of the rear of the transmission you can see the flange with the bolt holes where it bolts to the case. So what am I overlooking here?
 

Viperwolf1

Contributor
electron whisperer
Joined
Aug 23, 2007
Messages
24,448
I’m trying to wrap
My head around how this thing bolts up to a transmission. Where tail shaft housing bolts to the case, there’s already a like a retainer plate bolted there. In the pic of the rear of the transmission you can see the flange with the bolt holes where it bolts to the case. So what am I overlooking here?
Yep. That about sums it up. Weirdness. Maybe someone was trying to make a divorced D20 or it's part of a cold duck setup.
 

widowmaker77

Contributor
Sr. Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2007
Messages
564
Yep. That about sums it up. Weirdness. Maybe someone was trying to make a divorced D20 or it's part of a cold duck setup.
That was kinda what my thought process was, some sorta divorced set up. At ay rate it’s weird looking.
 
Top