...Since there also needs to be a ground cable from the engine to the body, I decided to make the blade terminal big enough so both the battery cable and a ground cable can solder into that one point.
Do you guys see any problem with me running my ground cable from a shared terminal with the negative cable and then putting the other side to the body? (near the starter solenoid is the plan, if not under it).
I'm I'm reading you right, you're wanting to solder both wires into the same end? If so, it's no problem as long as you're not planning to use two of the same gauge cable. if so, that sounds like just too much trouble. And not necessary.
If you mean just to use a 10 or, at the most, an 8 gauge wire as your body ground, then I say go for it.
The battery-to-body ground does not need to be the same size as the main battery-to-engine and battery-to-starter cables. It won't actually hurt anything to be oversized of course, but it's not necessary.
Same for the engine-to-body.
The most common body ground from the battery is a 10 gauge wire. The most common ground from the engine to the body on American vehicles is a braided wire.
Not sure what the "gauge equivalent" of that braid is, but it's probably in that same 8 to 10 gauge neighborhood. Just a guess though.
So if you're going to solder both into the same socket, just do the one large wire from the battery to the grounding point, and the second, smaller wire up to the bolt on the body.
And yes, doing it this way would seem to almost eliminate the need for the usual battery-to-body wire since you're, in effect, doing that with your common ground cable at the engine. However, it can't hurt to keep one at the battery and this one at the engine-to-battery interface.
And it's pretty simple to just add one short one from the main battery terminal straight to the nearest body panel. While you're making all this new stuff up, it would just make sense.
An extra ground can't hurt anyway. Even if it's not strictly necessary.
Paul