• Welcome to ClassicBroncos! - You are currently viewing the forums as a GUEST. To take advantage of all the site features, please take a moment to register. It's fast, simple and absolutely free. So please join our community today!
    If you have problems registering or can't log into your account, please contact Admin.

Sniper install {long} - with timing control

Broncobowsher

Total hack
Joined
Jun 4, 2002
Messages
37,074
Started the install of the Holley Sniper yesterday evening. About 2 hours in and better than halfway there. It is a drop on replacement for an existing aftermarket Edelbrock carb. In full disclosure this happens to be on a 460 in a 2WD '77 F250. But the details will be the same as a Bronco. The 460 architecture is pretty much an oversized small block. A duraspark is about the same as any other. So lessons learned here will carry over.

I have already done some pre install work. Both stock tanks (this will be a 2-tank EFI install) are stock. Lack any baffling. I added a new fuel pickup using a Holley hydramat. The stock pickup sock had already fallen off or fell apart. They will now be the fuel return. In the Hydramat instructions they mention returning the fuel right at the pickup. Do not return it at the top of the tank and allow it to waterfall. I had waterfalled the return in the past. Aerating the fuel. I used a 4-port accumulator to degas the fuel in the past. No accumulator this time. Also looking at stock EFI setups, the return is at the bottom. So both tanks are plumbed for a new pickup, and I drove around with the carb hooked to them so I know they work. When the hydramat goes dry, you are out of gas. Bonus, since it does suck the tank dry I get an extra 2 gallons out of a tank. The rest of the fuel system is experimental. Each tank has its own pump. Both outputs are tied together and feed a single filter. The theory is whichever fuel pump is running, is the delivery pump. The one not running is blocking fuel with the check valve. I remember working on an early 90's F150 that had a similar fuel system. Both tanks Tee'd together with no valve. The return I never figured out. But I figured mine. The entire original fuel system is now the return right down to the fuel selector valve. The selector valve in my case is a simple electric solenoid. Add a standard 5-pin relay. Coil attached to the fuel selector solenoid. Common to the fuel pump wire off the Sniper, Normally closed to the main tank pump, normally open to the aux tank pump. Failure modes, gas goes into the wrong tank. When I am done we will see how good this works.

Also part of the prep was I have an O2 bung welded to the exhaust down pipe. I have been driving it with a generic narrow band O2 installed and spliced into a free coupon Harbor Freight multi-meter. Idle with the carb is a little lean or a little rich depending on what mood it is in. The normal driving is generally a little rich except for fast cruising which was a little lean. A bit difficult to run that spot as it was driving faster than I liked. It was the spot just before you got into the power enrichment or maybe the secondaries. So I know I am starting with a fairly well tuned carb as a reference point. I can play with the choke and watch the meter and know right when I get into the choke as it goes from a rough idle lean cold miss to slightly rich and smooth.

So that is the prep I already did. For reference I have ran a Holley Projection 4Di about 20 years ago. That was an advanced system with an O2 sensor back in the day. Totally out of date today. I am looking forward to this new self learning EFI

Unboxing the EFI it looks good. Went for the classic gold which will mostly hide under the (slightly modified) stock air cleaner. The injectors are in the base, not on top like the old Projection/GM TBI. There is a ring of tiny holes just above the throttle blades for the fuel. No other obstructions, just 4 good sized throttle blades. Although I did notice that the secondary side doesn't open 100%. It opens almost all the way, I am not going to worry about this. The harness looks like good quality. Some over braid was provided but I went on Amazon and picked up some more so I could cover all of the exposed wires. Plenty of wire length on everything, in fact you need to plan a little on the routing to use up the extra wire length. Way better than too short. There are 3 capped vacuum ports on the back. One for ported vacuum (it's weird that it is on the secondary side of the throttle body but with 1:1 linkage it should work). A small manifold vacuum, in my case it will run the vacuum controlled heater valves. And a large vacuum port Holley calls "brake booster" but I will do PCV. It is branched equally to both sides. There is a pipe plugged vacuum port at the front of the throttle body. I would leave that alone. The computer is at the front of the throttle body along with the MAP sensor. It senses the front cavity that the vacuum port shares. I want to make sure this reads true manifold vacuum, not something less as you might get if there is air entering this port. Why is the port there? The Super Sniper kit supports boost, there are ways of blocking the MAP from reading internally and make it read external manifold vacuum/boost. So leave that from vacuum port plugged.

The plan:

I guess I better get to this. I will be doing the install in stages. In fact it is even a recommendation in the Holley instructions. Round one is simply get the EFI running and leave the stock Duraspark untouched (other than pulling switched power and tach signal). Do the basic carb swap approach.

Round 2 will be conversion to computer controlled timing. I am going to make the Duraspark distributor work. I don't see any reason I can't. I know Holley wants you to use there fancy expensive distributor options to make this work. They want an indexable rotor so the spark is on time. I got a couple simple tricks in mind. Stay tuned.

Round 3 is the progressive linkage upgrade. I picked up the simple kit from https://www.efisystempro.com/sniper/sniper-efi-system-components/sniper-efi-progressive-linkage-kit. There is a reason this is #3 instead of #2 in changes. The ported vacuum is on the secondary side of the throttle body. With the Holley supplied 1:1 linkage this works just fine. But with a progressive linkage, there would never be any vacuum advance. Going computer timing first means this isn't a problem. As far as the progressive linkage only opening the secondaries 97% with the simple linkage, that is about what they open to now with the Holley linkage straight out of the box. And it's not like the 250-300HP will be hindered at all by slightly less than 800 CFM the throttle body is rated for.

Kickdown is going to be a problem. When I was at SEMA looking these kits over and asking questions they stated that the old style Ford kickdown doesn't work on the Sniper. People have adapted it to work. I have a kit off the Edelbrock that I really don't like because it sticks out so far but I am going to start with that and see if it will work. Thought about a Lokar cable kickdown. And I am thinking of going electronic and using a diesel shut down solenoid controlled by an Arduino. In short there are options, but if you have a C4 or C6 with the original kickdown rod be warned that there will be challenges ahead for you. And if you have an AOD, you also need to think about the throttle valve won't be paired to the throttle correctly. With the larger throttle body and 1:1 linkage on the secondaries part throttle will be making a lot more engine torque then the TV will be showing. You will probably want to start with the progressive linkage kit so the trans will live through light throttle driving. Hopefully if you are doing a Sniper you won't be dealing with an AOD and will have something a lot newer like a 4R70W.

Well that's it for now. I got it opened, planned, and bolted to the engine. Fuel supply is hooked up. For the low pressure rubber hose I am running Shields barrier marine rubber fuel hose. The pressure side is Earl's vapor guard EFI hose. Not cheap stuff, but they have an inner layer to protect the hose from the fuel. To get the hose to slip over the fitting I wet the connection with a drop of 2-stroke oil (it is designed to mix with fuel and burn in an engine). I am stopped right now because I am missing parts. The return is on hold because I forgot to order the replacement roll of 3/8" tubing. I have the flaring tool to do AN-6 and the feed and return on the EFI are AN-6 fittings. I am going to try to make a one piece return line from the EFI down to the old fuel pump. And just a little rubber jumper to the frame. I'm down to the last bit of hard line and rubber hose, not enough to finish. So on hold for parts.

Wiring is laid out in the engine room. There is one relay in the harness right next to the fuse. That is going on the firewall right behind the engine. There is enough harness that it can be moved side to side. On a Bronco it would be shifted toward the passenger side and still reach the engine just fine. For the basic install you have 5 wires to deal with. Power and ground. Switched ignition (planning on pulling that off the duraspark, need to check for hot in crank first). That is the 4 wires they tell you makes for an easy install. The 5th wire, you have to do this as well but it is just power to the fuel pump.

Time to order parts. Should be running in a couple of weeks. Stay tuned, more to come.
 
Last edited:

admin

Administrator
Just your friendly, neighborhood webmaster...
Joined
Jan 1, 2001
Messages
38,894
Loc.
Phoenix, AZ
Thanks for all the detailed info Tim. I'll be subscribing to see how it progresses.
 

72_EB

Contributor
66to77
Joined
Feb 4, 2003
Messages
4,982
Good thread. :)
Look forward to what you come up with the Duraspark and kickdown.
Keep an eye on pressure regulator and screen. The early ones seems to have some issues that Holley has since solved.
 
OP
OP
Broncobowsher

Broncobowsher

Total hack
Joined
Jun 4, 2002
Messages
37,074
It is a new one. The progressive linkage needs the updated version. Mine came with the factory upgraded software. The software was released less than a year ago so I know this one is less than a year old.

I have the steel fuel line now. Hopefully in a couple of days I will have time to get back on it. I am hoping to have this running by the end of next weekend.
 

Timmy390

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Jan 1, 2011
Messages
5,948
Loc.
Conway, AR
Very interested in the kickdown issue.

Am looking at Sniper or FiTech for my 69 Mach 1 and it has the C6 kickdown rod that has to attach to the TB linkage to work.

So none of the Holly kickdown kits from a carb will work on the TB? I had to buy one of the kits and add it to my 77 street avenger to add the kickdown.

Tim
 
OP
OP
Broncobowsher

Broncobowsher

Total hack
Joined
Jun 4, 2002
Messages
37,074
Very interested in the kickdown issue.

Am looking at Sniper or FiTech for my 69 Mach 1 and it has the C6 kickdown rod that has to attach to the TB linkage to work.

So none of the Holly kickdown kits from a carb will work on the TB? I had to buy one of the kits and add it to my 77 street avenger to add the kickdown.

Tim

Correct. According to the Holley rep at SEMA the kickdown is not a bolt on like on the carb kits. I'm guessing it might have something to do with the injection being wider? I have the Edelbrock kickdown already, so I am going to try it. I really don't like the Edelbrock, it moves the ball stud even further away from the throttle body. The throttle rod with it runs at an angle I don't like. I would not recommend it, but it is what I have for now. If I were to do it over I would look at the Lokar cable kickdown. But for now I am going to try the Edelbrock. And the Holley rep did say that people have modified the Holley kickdown to work, but he didn't say what the modification was.

In short, if you need the kickdown there will be extra work to get it to work. But it isn't a show stopper. Just takes a little more work.

But I like a challenge. With how this C6 runs it will shift at 2500 RPM full throttle without kickdown or about 4300 RPM with kickdown. You can get some funny stuff if you are right at the kickdown point. So I have an idea (another of my hair brain thoughts) that I could put a better hysteresis on the kickdown if I use an Arduino. No more right on the edge, solenoid is on or off. I can lift to less than full throttle and still keep the downshift, perfect for grades where full throttle is too much but upshifting is too little.
 

Timmy390

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Jan 1, 2011
Messages
5,948
Loc.
Conway, AR
It's been years so I could be wrong......I don't think the Lokar will work on the Stang. I recall researching it back many years ago. The car was mission the kickdown rod and I paid big bucks for one. It's mustang specific....hell Big Block specific as well.....

Post up some pics once you get the kick down sorted out......interested to see how you modify it to work.

Tim
 

toddz69

Sponsor/Vendor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Nov 28, 2001
Messages
11,210
Great info, Tim! Subscribed and looking forward to your further adventures - as always!

Todd Z.
 
OP
OP
Broncobowsher

Broncobowsher

Total hack
Joined
Jun 4, 2002
Messages
37,074
Did a little more work this evening. PCV is not centered and I have a hard PCV line. Made a new one.
Worked on the return line. Using the same routing as the original feed on the engine. Had to remake it in 3/8" to match. Remove the fuel pump. A little extra length to reach the back of the throttle body. And with the pump removed I need to support the hard line down near the fuel pump. Even with as little gas as I spilled after an hour it was time to call it quits.

The Edelbrock kickdown is different enough I won't be using it on the Holley. If I really had to I could make it work. But I didn't like the bad angles to start with so I canned it. I'll just manual downshift for now. I am looking at pneumatic for the downshift, the small air cylinders are cheap and I already have air for the air horn. I'm thinking of trying the NOS controller function. Full throttle NOS application will actually be downshift. Timing retard set to zero. This might work. There is also a feature for "pedaling" that I need to look into. I believe it is something about when you back off full throttle and get back on it.

Another thing with the Sniper is you can do laptop setup as well. I have the software already. The USB to CAN cable is $50 that I will do later.

I have not mentioned it but another feature I am looking at is canister purge. Talking with the Holley rep at SEMA he suggested that I hook that to the secondary fuel pump logic. There are multiple programable inputs and outputs. One option for an output is to turn on a secondary fuel system. I'll just set the throttle input at 5% and an adequate vacuum signal and RPM, that you can only get at cruise and let it purge.

I would like to get it out of the garage this weekend. Still need to finish the plumbing and all the electrical.
 
OP
OP
Broncobowsher

Broncobowsher

Total hack
Joined
Jun 4, 2002
Messages
37,074
OK, progress has been made. Drove it to town and back twice now. Have about 25 miles on it. So no long term use but there are some initial impressions.

Idle is better. Cold start is much better. Hot start is much better. Cruise is about the same. Full throttle is about the same. Tip in drivability is worse. The exhaust is much cleaner, that is really nice.

The hand held controller can be fussy. Took a while to learn to press with a fingernail and not the tip of the finger. Good thing I had not trimmed my nails yet. The basic setup wizard worked well. The first start is better than it ever started with the carb. Overall tune is very good and it appears to be dialing itself in. The only spot I have a glitch is a quick snap of the throttle and return to idle. Acts like it wants a dashpot. The IAC is a stepper motor and can't respond fast enough. Looking at the timing control (not hooked up at this point) I think that will take care of it.

It needs the progressive throttle bad. As good as the actual tune of the EFI is, the drivability is actually worse. Power wise it feels responsive, but it isn't controlled. I am looking forward to getting that little piece of linkage in place. Slight touch of the throttle and it is an on/off switch, and the power is just turned on. Takes a lot more skill to control the throttle just off idle.

The instructions say it takes 2.5 seconds to "boot". If you wait that 2.5 seconds before cranking the engine it starts great. If you don't wait, the start is a little rough. The IAC hasn't reset to the start position. No issue with a stall, it will fire right up, computer is already booted and still running. Only initial key on start. Nothing bad, just something to point out. It is still better than the Projection that wouldn't start moving the IAC until the engine was running. So a cold start was start the engine let it idle really low for a few seconds as the computer realized it was a low idle and opened the IAC. So the Sniper is a win for getting better. I do see potential for further improvement with a next generation (set the IAC position after engine shut down but before going to sleep, post engine shut down setting).

I do plan to drive it this way for a few tanks of gas just to see how it dials itself in. Next step is adding the timing control. The sniper came with a coil driver as a separate piece. 4-wires on the driver, 2 wires for the magnetic pickup, lock the mechanical advance, align the rotor to the cap. After that is running, the progressive kit.

As for the dual tank EFI configuration. It works. Admittedly only 25 miles so far but I did play with switching it back and forth. It all appears to work perfect. The check valves appear to be working. The change in pumps is quick enough that the EFI never notices. The selector valve routes the fuel back to the correct tank. No fancy 6-port valve needed. Just a pump for each tank, merged together and into the filter and supply to the EFI. Return is the simple 3-port solenoid style valve. Aux tank is selected the power is sent to the solenoid and a SPDT relay. The relay switches the pump command wire from main to aux pumps. Really surprised nobody has done this before.

Next update will be April or May.
 
Last edited:

markw

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Sep 10, 2009
Messages
2,066
Nice writeup. We tried something similar with my Bronco fuel system, we couldn't make it work. Would you be willing to draw a schematic for your system? Sounds like an excellent solution to a vexing problem. Thanks, Mark
 
OP
OP
Broncobowsher

Broncobowsher

Total hack
Joined
Jun 4, 2002
Messages
37,074
It has been running for a week or so now. Tried to take it up to the Stampede on Saturday afternoon. One of the Spectra fuel pumps started to die out half way there. Knowing I got both pumps at the same time I thought it would be best to head home and not away from home. Other than the fuel pump (not part of the kit) it ran good. Got 150 miles on it on the highway. When I got home the faulty pump was tried again and was working, but WAY louder than the good pump. Contacted Summit and a new pump under warranty is on the way.

Local driving (50MPH flat roads) is about 10% throttle. Highway is about 16% throttle. I am hating the throttle response. To and from work (the 10%) if I twitch a little (7% or 14%) it falls on its face or pulls strong. The throttle response is too much. As soon as this fuel pump issue is fixed I am going for the progressive kit. I'm not waiting for the ignition first. It needs to be more drivable before I worry about fuel economy.

So far I have adjusted the idle screw. It is set to 10% IAC at warm idle. Went back and read the manual, range is 2-10%. I am going to dial in a little more idle screw and try for 5% and see if I can tell any difference.

The one slider I have played with is the accel fuel enrichment. I cranked this up, bad idea. It will flood and stall at tip in. Think accelerator pump, and it is capable of doing a HUGE mega shot. If I was running a tunnel ram perhaps? Then I shut it down too far, lean sneeze at tip in. So I pulled into a school parking lot and did launches in the bus loading zone. Various different tip in amounts and different enrichment settings. Really not hard to do. Not part of the self learning apparently.

It will now bark the tires off the line. So it does have more power. With the carb it would never think about squaking them. Another thing I noticed was the shift points on the transmission have changed. With the carb it would do shifts at about 2500 RPM without kickdown hooked up. It would shift at that speed if you were just above the kickdown as well. Now I am getting low 3000 RPM shifts, roughly 800 RPM more. I guess I was pulling enough vacuum at full throttle to get an early shift. With the bigger throttle body there is less restriction so no vacuum on the modulator on the top end.

More to come.
 
OP
OP
Broncobowsher

Broncobowsher

Total hack
Joined
Jun 4, 2002
Messages
37,074
Thought of something else. Divided plenum. No problem. I know FiTech is known for issues with divided plunum intakes. The Holley is just fine. I have a theory on this. The MAP sensor is part of the computer. The sensing port is in the front channel that branches to both sides of the intake. I think it was the first post where I pointed out there is a vacuum port at the front of the throttle body that is plugged and not to use it.

Does anyone with a FiTech, can you check if the MAP reads both plenums or is it on a single side. That might be why the FiTech is unhappy on a divided plenum.
 

Timmy390

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Jan 1, 2011
Messages
5,948
Loc.
Conway, AR
Does anyone with a FiTech, can you check if the MAP reads both plenums or is it on a single side. That might be why the FiTech is unhappy on a divided plenum.

While I do not have a FiTech, it's my understanding (after reading till my eyes bleed) that is the issue. The MAP on the FiTech only reads one side of the plenum. The fix was to grind down the plenum just a bit so it could read both sides.

They might have updated this on the Fitech now. I did my research back when it first came out. One of the main reasons I didn't put one on my Mach 1. I have a $$$ dual plane and didn't want to start grinding on it.

Tim
 
OP
OP
Broncobowsher

Broncobowsher

Total hack
Joined
Jun 4, 2002
Messages
37,074
OK, that answers the divided plenum issue. FiTech didn't engineer it right, Holley did.
 
Top