• Welcome to ClassicBroncos! - You are currently viewing the forums as a GUEST. To take advantage of all the site features, please take a moment to register. It's fast, simple and absolutely free. So please join our community today!
    If you have problems registering or can't log into your account, please contact Admin.

SURFACE GRINDING SNAP RINGS

Oldtimer

Contributor
Jr. Member with Sr. moments
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Messages
1,795
Loc.
Sunnyvale, CA
Can a snap ring be ground on a surface grinder without compromising its integrity?

The D20 T Shift Transfer Case uses a C6TZ 7070-B snap ring the retain the main drive gear on input shaft.
The C6TZ 7070-B snap ring is no longer available.
The 8A-7064 snap ring is available. It has the correct ID and Width, but is too thick.
Tom’s 4015B is too thin and too narrow.

C6TZ 7070-B -- ID 1.222 -- TK .064 -- W .157
8A-7064 ------- ID 1.220 -- TK .093 -- W .156
Tom’s 4015B -- ID 1.170 -- TK .058 --- W .089
JBG 11624 ---- Not in stock, no dimensions


1788477755185.png
 

jamesroney

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Sep 11, 2007
Messages
2,598
Loc.
Fremont, CA
Can a snap ring be ground on a surface grinder without compromising its integrity?
Yes.

Especially if you flood cool it. If you are only doing a few, no problem.

The steel is heat treated before finishing, and is thru-hardened. You just need to make sure you don't anneal it.

Factory snap rings are finish sized on a double disc lapping machine, but if you are only making a few...no problem on a horizontal spindle mag mount chuck.

But if you are going to the trouble of machining your own snap ring, why not go ahead and widen the shaft snap ring groove? Then you can use the fat snap ring.
 
OP
OP
Oldtimer

Oldtimer

Contributor
Jr. Member with Sr. moments
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Messages
1,795
Loc.
Sunnyvale, CA
I think I will have better success finding a machine shop to surface grind snap rings than one willing to make an interrupted cut in a hardened shaft.

If they grind all 10, I will have a part (and solution) that others can use.
 

Broncobowsher

Total hack
Joined
Jun 4, 2002
Messages
37,074
My understanding, yes it will work. Even through you see sparks as it is ground, it is still considered a cold process.
I'm trying to get a surface grinder put back in service at work. I'm still learning about these things.
 

Jason Miller

New Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2026
Messages
3
Good call getting all 10 done, you're about to become the D20 snap ring guy and the forum will owe you one.

To echo the machining wisdom above: yes, surface grinding is fine here because these rings are thru-hardened, so you're not skating a thin case off a soft core. The only thing that can bite you is heat. The rule of thumb is watch the temper colors. A light straw is no big deal, but if the ground face goes blue or purple you've locally annealed it and the hardness in that spot is gone. Flood cooling, like mentioned, keeps you well clear of that, and taking a few light passes beats one heavy grind every time.

One thing worth doing once they're back: deburr the ground edges and actually measure one with a mic before you trust the batch. And double check the .064 lands in the groove with a hair of clearance, you don't want it proud.

On the "stack two thin ones" idea from earlier: I'd skip it for a retained gear. Two rings can rotate against each other and you lose the solid shoulder you're after. The ground single ring is the cleaner answer, which is exactly the route you took.

Post up the final dimensions and the shop you used when they're done, the next guy with a dead C6TZ 7070-B will thank you forever.
 

ba123

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Oct 29, 2022
Messages
2,757
Loc.
CA
There has got to be a snap ring available to match.

Worst case, I'd bet Advance Adapters has one.

If not, JBG will tell you what their part is if you call or email and ask.

There is literally no way that there isn't a clip available somewhere.
 

Grey owl

Contributor
Sr. Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2024
Messages
395
You would have to grind it to the correct specific thickness. Thats important to prevent a possible failure.
 

DirtDonk

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Nov 3, 2003
Messages
51,619
I must have missed something. Is the correct ring not available? Do we have anything at WH that you wanna try?
 

ba123

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Oct 29, 2022
Messages
2,757
Loc.
CA
I saw one or two on the WH site but there is no info.
 

DirtDonk

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Nov 3, 2003
Messages
51,619
Too bad I waited till Friday. I’ll have to find out more about them.
 
OP
OP
Oldtimer

Oldtimer

Contributor
Jr. Member with Sr. moments
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Messages
1,795
Loc.
Sunnyvale, CA
Paul,
WH only has the large internal snap ring that goes in the extension housing, and retains the OD of the input shaft Bearing. Tom's & Jeff's both carry this snap ring.

There are also 2 small external snap rings, one for the main drive gear on the input shaft, and the other for the front drive constant mesh gear to the output shaft.
The 1966 Ford parts have been discontinued for years. There are no NOS parts in the country, and the rebuilders use the old ones (after reforming), or harvested ones from cores they have.
Some of the other Bronco vendors sell snap rings that might work, but they are thinner and narrower then the original Ford/Spicer parts.
 
OP
OP
Oldtimer

Oldtimer

Contributor
Jr. Member with Sr. moments
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Messages
1,795
Loc.
Sunnyvale, CA
@Kalex asked about WH#7215 , large internal snap ring . I have not touched it or the ones the other vendors sell, so I can't comment on dimensions.

If you google the Ford number C6TZ 7070-A you will find NOS parts on EBAY.

The large internal snap ring does not get as beat up when removing, so they can be reused.
The small external ones get deformed when opening up to slide off of their shafts.
The one on the front output shaft is trapped between a gear and a bearing, so it has a high mortality.
 

ksagis

Contributor
Aspiring Bronco Guru
Joined
Jun 15, 2020
Messages
818
Loc.
Austin
@Old Timer, I poked around and see what you mean on availability. Seems like the C6TZ 7070-B is a bit of non standard size.

Are the dimensions you state above as measured, or stated on in spec writeups? Have you put calipers on snap ring groove on the shaft and is it roughly 0.004 to 0.006" wider than the ring you have now? Similar question on the ring you removed, is it 0.064" thick?
 
OP
OP
Oldtimer

Oldtimer

Contributor
Jr. Member with Sr. moments
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Messages
1,795
Loc.
Sunnyvale, CA
I poked around and see what you mean on availability. Seems like the C6TZ 7070-B is a bit of non standard size.

Are the dimensions you state above as measured, or stated on in spec writeups? Have you put calipers on snap ring groove on the shaft and is it roughly 0.004 to 0.006" wider than the ring you have now? Similar question on the ring you removed, is it 0.064" thick?
The ring I removed is .064" thick, and .157" wide.
The the groove in the shaft is 1.252" OD, and it is .083" wide. The shaft OD is 1.375.

EDIT: With bearing and main drive gear installed on input shaft, the available gap for a snap ring is .067", not the total .083" groove width.

The ring sold by Tom's is only .058" thick and .089" wide, which sent me on the search for something closer to stock.

1788625899694.png
 
Last edited:

ksagis

Contributor
Aspiring Bronco Guru
Joined
Jun 15, 2020
Messages
818
Loc.
Austin
Wow, that snap ring groove is a lot wider than I expected - when I've spec'd snap ring grooves they're generally about 0.005" larger than the thickness of snap ring for GD&T allowances.

That seems to jive with what James said that this is a not a highly loaded joint else I'd think they'd hold the groove to be a lot smaller (assuming it hasn't worn wider during use).

You're adding 0.008" of gap to what was a 0.019" gap.

I did the math fast but think you lose about 0.060" of snap ring width due to depth so the one from Tom's seems borderline wide enough... Feels like the width is more important than the thickness.
 
OP
OP
Oldtimer

Oldtimer

Contributor
Jr. Member with Sr. moments
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Messages
1,795
Loc.
Sunnyvale, CA
That snap ring sees no load except when reversing in 4wd. (or engine braking in 4wd) It's mostly along for the ride in 2WD.

The thrust side of the tooth forces the gear against the bearing in the forward direction. I've seen old dana 18's with the nut loose, and that gear stays put.

If you are in a pinch, the 3-4 synchro hub snap ring from a 64-73 Toploader is the right ID, and thickness. It's not nearly as wide though. I'm not saying it's exact, but there's more than a few Dana 20's that I have built with the smaller OD snap ring.

James.

@jamesroney , Thanks for explaining load condition against snap ring.
Which Toploader model did your snap rings come from?
All the snap rings from my 72 Toploader (RF-D2AR-7006-CB W1) are too thick to fit in the groove of my T-shift D20 input shaft.
In fact the MPC calls out the 8A 7064 for 65 on Toploader 3-4 syncro hub.

1788639381493.png
 
OP
OP
Oldtimer

Oldtimer

Contributor
Jr. Member with Sr. moments
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Messages
1,795
Loc.
Sunnyvale, CA
Edit to post #16:

With bearing and main drive gear installed on input shaft, the available gap for a snap ring is .067", not the total .083" groove width.
 

jamesroney

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Sep 11, 2007
Messages
2,598
Loc.
Fremont, CA
@jamesroney , Thanks for explaining load condition against snap ring.
Which Toploader model did your snap rings come from?
All the snap rings from my 72 Toploader (RF-D2AR-7006-CB W1) are too thick to fit in the groove of my T-shift D20 input shaft.
In fact the MPC calls out the 8A 7064 for 65 on Toploader 3-4 syncro hub.
I looked at the kit, and it is generic. It has about 25 more snap rings and thrust washers than a single trans can possibly use. I thought it was the 3-4 synchro hub, but your MPC says no. David Kee Toploaders also says no. So I can't be right. Sorry.
 
Top