• Welcome to ClassicBroncos! - You are currently viewing the forums as a GUEST. To take advantage of all the site features, please take a moment to register. It's fast, simple and absolutely free. So please join our community today!
    If you have problems registering or can't log into your account, please contact Admin.

Need help Quick. RuffStuff Steering GM 1 Ton TRE

mnido

Contributor
Sr. Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2007
Messages
993
Just want to clarify before I purchase and or the sale ends. Is this considered a over the knuckle conversion? And do you ream from the top down on the knuckles or do you purchase their inserts and just drill a 1'' hole and use the inserts? Thanks and sorry if this sounds dumb, just don't want to make a mistake.
 

Attachments

  • ylink.jpg
    ylink.jpg
    16.7 KB · Views: 47

Sabas

Sr. Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2003
Messages
654
I am running GM Tie Rods, same thing as Ruffstuff, but I got mine thru Scott @ americanbronco

Sabas
 
OP
OP
mnido

mnido

Contributor
Sr. Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2007
Messages
993
I am running GM Tie Rods, same thing as Ruffstuff, but I got mine thru Scott @ americanbronco

Sabas

Please did you ream from the top down or did you use the inserts ???
 

Sabas

Sr. Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2003
Messages
654
I reamed from top down,going slow, don't want to ream too much.
Sabas
 

DirtDonk

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Nov 3, 2003
Messages
49,452
Yes, in that configuration (with the studs oriented downward) that is considered an over-the-knuckle, or a tie-rod over, or just "TRO" conversion.

And while you do ream from the top to make a hole the right size for the new tapered studs coming in from the top, there are still some times when using the tapered inserts/sleeves is appropriate, even with the reaming.
That's what some inserts are for anyway. To fill in the old taper so that the new taper from the top has more material to bite into and there is no part of the rod end stud that is not touching metal.

Don't know if it's better one way or the other in your case, but I'm sure someone will know. Either way, it's a good system and should work well for you unless you've got some unusual setup.

What year is your Bronco? What other mods have been done to it? Anything that might get in the way of a heavy-duty TRO setup? For example, dual-shock lower mounts welded to the c-bushing caps?

Paul
 

browngr5

Jr. Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2010
Messages
218
Loc.
Eagle, Idaho
I did the tie rod under, either way it's a great upgrade. I may be wrong on the tie rod over, but verify the drag link to track bar clearance before you commit to reaming. I hear some people use a track bar riser on the axle housing to clear tie rod over setup.
As Sabas mentioned, take your time with the reamer. It's easy to ream too deep.
 
OP
OP
mnido

mnido

Contributor
Sr. Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2007
Messages
993
Yes, in that configuration (with the studs oriented downward) that is considered an over-the-knuckle, or a tie-rod over, or just "TRO" conversion.

And while you do ream from the top to make a hole the right size for the new tapered studs coming in from the top, there are still some times when using the tapered inserts/sleeves is appropriate, even with the reaming.
That's what some inserts are for anyway. To fill in the old taper so that the new taper from the top has more material to bite into and there is no part of the rod end stud that is not touching metal.

Don't know if it's better one way or the other in your case, but I'm sure someone will know. Either way, it's a good system and should work well for you unless you've got some unusual setup.

What year is your Bronco? What other mods have been done to it? Anything that might get in the way of a heavy-duty TRO setup? For example, dual-shock lower mounts welded to the c-bushing caps?

Paul

Its 1974, stock power steering, Tom's disc brake conversion, 6'' WCB radius arms., f-250 shock tower, 3- 1/2'' Tom's coils.
 
Top