• Welcome to ClassicBroncos! - You are currently viewing the forums as a GUEST. To take advantage of all the site features, please take a moment to register. It's fast, simple and absolutely free. So please join our community today!
    If you have problems registering or can't log into your account, please contact Admin.

Whelp.. Squeal turned into engine torn apart

DirtDonk

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Nov 3, 2003
Messages
49,244
When you get the Explorer damper you'll see just how much farther in the pulley is.
And no, I'd say that you can't use our adapter pulley with your existing damper. Even if it's 3-bolts, yours just looks too different from a stock Bronco damper to be correct.
Of course it's always open to testing, but from initial looks I'd say it's not going to work.
So you're back to using a re-balanced Explorer damper with your new setup as the best bet.

You may be able to re-use the timing pointer you have now, so hang on to it and see when you get to that point.
But better still, no matter what you end up doing with timing, make sure that when you have the timing cover off you rotate your engine to TDC first, lining up the marks.
This way you have a zero point to start from from then on.
And if neither this pointer, or the Explorer "thingy" (it's not really a pointer like you'd want to use in your case) line up to your satisfaction, get some Timing Tape from Mr Gasket or wherever and create your own markings to line up with whatever point, or pointer you choose.

This way, from now on until doomsday you will be able to accurately set the ignition timing and no guessing.

Paul
 

904Bronco

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Sep 28, 2004
Messages
6,002
Loc.
San Martin, CA

DirtDonk

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Nov 3, 2003
Messages
49,244
Thanks Doug. That would definitely be the easy and inexpensive way if it is a 3-bolt.
Well worth taking some measurements at least. Once you've determined how many bolts that is.

Good luck

Paul
 
OP
OP
G

guidoverduci

Contributor
Sr. Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
731
Loc.
NorCal
Ok.. got some part numbers and a pic of the engine build sheet. I posted in just to see if there’s any valuable info that can be pulled from it. I don’t know much about engines.. learning as I go... and I’ve been slowly trying to decode this build sheet.

The harmonic balancer appears to be a 4 bolt and there seems to be a debate about the part number being a 50oz balancer. I’m reading different google searches now...

Part #s:
E8TE-A3A - balancer
RF-E7TE-6059-BA stamped on timing cover
E9TA-8A528 - water pump pulley
F2UA-6312-CA - crank pulley
 

Attachments

  • F13E9351-6CCB-404F-B181-C31312A405BC.jpg
    F13E9351-6CCB-404F-B181-C31312A405BC.jpg
    208.5 KB · Views: 24
  • EEE8C7EA-35CC-4ECC-9E43-BB56F7C46BD9.jpg
    EEE8C7EA-35CC-4ECC-9E43-BB56F7C46BD9.jpg
    194.3 KB · Views: 17
OP
OP
G

guidoverduci

Contributor
Sr. Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
731
Loc.
NorCal
Ok fellas, I've got everything pretty much torn off and ready. This is definitely a fun project and I'm enjoying learning about engines. I need to be careful though, sometimes I tear into things and mess them up worse because I didn't realize the mechanics behind them. So feel free to tell me things to watch out for from a complete newbie perspective. For example, I had it line up 0 degrees TDC from the markings and then while I was trying to get the balancer off, the crank rotated a bit. So in it's current state, the timing cover is off and I'm not sure where TDC is. I see there's dots on the chain to try and line up, but there's more than one.. and a triangle. Also, one side of the timing chain is pretty tight and the other has a little play in it, should I replace it? Do I just find a 351w timing set? The timing stuff still confuses me. And even though this is a 351W, according to the engine paperwork, and a few other written docs, the PO changed the firing order to match a 302. Does this have an effect on anything when reinstalling everything? Why would someone do that?

Other things.. I've drained the coolant from the radiator, but how would I get the rest out of the block? Do I need to? I've also drained the oil... which I'm hoping there's enough residual to not damage anything if I need to rotate the crank.

As far as the balancer, while some google searches pulled up as 50oz, it would seem like the majority say it's 28oz. I'm waiting to get the parts from sandman to measure out and see what I need to make it work. I ended up not getting the balancer from him since I'd have to have it rebalanced anyways. It made more sense to buy one balanced.
 

DirtDonk

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Nov 3, 2003
Messages
49,244
...The harmonic balancer appears to be a 4 bolt

Then we can rule out our adapter pulley.

...and there seems to be a debate about the part number being a 50oz balancer.

Well if there is, then there is doubt whether or not you have a 351.
Back to what was discussed before ALL 351 Windsor engines are 28oz engines. So if yours was running smoothly, then whatever the damper is, is correct for the engine.
Now we just have to verify it's a 351 then? The pulley is a '92 part number (the "F2" part) and the rest were used beginning in the '87 and '88 model years (the "E7" and "E8" and "E9" parts)
But the balancer makes it look like a 351 again.

E8TE-A3A - balancer

My search looks like it's a 28oz unit for a 351. So far, so good.

RF-E7TE-6059-BA stamped on timing cover
E9TA-8A528 - water pump pulley
F2UA-6312-CA - crank pulley

The timing cover and crank pulley are truck parts specifically, so what you were told before is starting to sound more correct. Some car parts get used on trucks, and maybe truck parts on cars, but I have not seen that personally.

I don't know off-hand what specific vehicle they might be from though.

Paul
 

DirtDonk

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Nov 3, 2003
Messages
49,244
Not sure why they’re sideways... sorry!

Happens to me all the time! Not for sure why yet either, but I know that it doesn't seem to matter if you hold the camera one way or the other. "Officially" you're supposed to hold the button on the right when you hold the phone sideways. But that's what I do and it still does it.
But unfortunately for me, it also does it when I hold my phone (apple) upright with the button at the bottom.
No rhyme or reason for me at least.

I'll just download them and rotate them on my computer for easier reading.

Paul
 

DirtDonk

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Nov 3, 2003
Messages
49,244
...For example, I had it line up 0 degrees TDC from the markings and then while I was trying to get the balancer off, the crank rotated a bit. So in it's current state, the timing cover is off and I'm not sure where TDC is.

That's fine, you're going to do it from the inside markings anyway. Whenever you have a Ford Windsor family of engines, never trust the outside markings until you've verified their accuracy by the inside markings!
Sad, but true...

...I see there's dots on the chain to try and line up, but there's more than one.. and a triangle.

This is good. Wait until someone who's done it recently can chime in and remind us of which markings to use. But this is perfect, so not to worry.
Whenever you're going to be removing the front cover, the ultimate markings (the dots and triangles and smiley faces and such on the gears) are what you will use to get the true TDC on the compression stroke of #1 cylinder.
Remember that the markings on the crank and it's damper/balancer come around twice for every one time the distributor is pointed in the right direction. But when you can see both the crank gear and the cam gear under the timing cover, you can see both their markings and those only line up once. When everything is on TDC (or near it if you have offset markings, but I'm sure there will be more discussion on that later).
Now, once you've got the gear markings lined up, try not to rotate the crank after that until you have your timing marks on the damper ring verified. That way you can more easily repeat the setting if it is moved.
But even if you do rotate it a tiny bit by accident, you'll know that you're still close and can simply rotate it back via the outside markings which you will now know are right on.

...Also, one side of the timing chain is pretty tight and the other has a little play in it, should I replace it?

It's a pretty new chain and gear set, so let's check the play.
It's perfectly normal for their to be a minimal amount of play, and that play will only be on the "coast" side of the chain when you turn the crank. So if you, for example, turn the crankshaft clockwise, it pulls the chain tight on the driver's side and all excess slack goes to the passenger side. Turn the crank the other way, and the opposite occurs.
What dictates good or bad, is just how much excess play there actually is. You need a tiny bit just to install the chain and gears. There is a specification somewhere, so we should find it (someone here has the rebuild book and can find the spec here) somewhere.

...Do I just find a 351w timing set?

In theory, yes. But let's hold off for now. Until you determine if it even needs to be replaced.

The timing stuff still confuses me.

Remember we're now talking about two potential types of "timing" for an engine. There is "ignition timing" where you set the spark event by twisting the distributor and reading the numbers with a light.
Then there's "cam timing" which is what the spark timing is based off of ultimately of course, but we need to keep them both clear in our heads when talking about engine internals and tuning.

And even though this is a 351W, according to the engine paperwork, and a few other written docs, the PO changed the firing order to match a 302.

This is because the "ignition timing" can be changed any time a new camshaft is swapped in. Such as in your case, a Crane Cam unit was installed. If you can somehow get the cam number from the builder (or if they included a "cam card" with all the info on it) that would confirm everything.
Cams for Ford Windsors come in two flavors, though I have no idea why anyone would ever use an old 302 firing order in a modern engine. No reason to since the 351 firing order is "better" for a few reasons.
Not that the engine won't run and live on the other version, but if just for continuity alone, and less confusion down the road, keeping the 13726548 firing order would have been the best practice.
You just have to remember to orient the plug wires in the other 15426378 order.

Pretty healthy cam too by the way. Would be a real thumper in a 302, but less radical for the larger 351 (more cubes, less sensitivity to duration and lift amounts) and probably a healthy runner once you get it all back up and running.

Does this have an effect on anything when reinstalling everything? Why would someone do that?

Only reason is that they found a cam they liked, from a company they liked, at a price they liked, and available quickly for their use, but it had the "wrong" firing order built into it.
I've seen that before, where traditional cam manufacturers were tending to stick more with the 302 firing order for all their models, instead of choosing the 351 order and sticking with it instead.
Old habits and likely some lack of information. Though the latter seems far-fetched given Crane's history with building nice Ford cams. I'm sure just as many, if not more people were building hopped up 351's as were hopped up 289's and 302's. But maybe they had some old-school clever deep seated reason to do so.
We may never know...

Other things.. I've drained the coolant from the radiator, but how would I get the rest out of the block? Do I need to? I've also drained the oil... which I'm hoping there's enough residual to not damage anything if I need to rotate the crank.

Yep, you'll be fine. But I would still try to keep as much out of the oil pan as possible. Stuff rags and paper towels, and leave your drain plug open for any coolant that does come out to drain right out. Any tiny bit that does make it into the pan will evaporate after you bring the engine to running temperatures. Assuming there is not a whole lot of it that is.
Hence leaving the drain open, or at least draining it again before filling with oil.

You can introduce compressed air into the heater hose, or it's fittings on the intake or pump (if still installed) and get some more out. Keep the heater control valve all the way to HOT so you get the most flow through the system if you use the heater hose as your entry point.

Another method is to just use water if you don't have pressure. Yes, you'll retain some water in the system, just like the coolant. But pure water makes much less of a mess, causes less contamination of oil and other stuff, and generally just isn't as nasty. It will even evaporate on it's own given enough time, but bring the engine up to full temps and your PCV system will suck the steam right out of the crankcase.

But as always, taking more care in the initial stages makes for less worry and headache in the future.

As far as the balancer, while some google searches pulled up as 50oz, it would seem like the majority say it's 28oz. I'm waiting to get the parts from sandman to measure out and see what I need to make it work. I ended up not getting the balancer from him since I'd have to have it rebalanced anyways. It made more sense to buy one balanced.

Makes sense.

Paul
 
OP
OP
G

guidoverduci

Contributor
Sr. Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
731
Loc.
NorCal
This is because the "ignition timing" can be changed any time a new camshaft is swapped in. Such as in your case, a Crane Cam unit was installed. If you can somehow get the cam number from the builder (or if they included a "cam card" with all the info on it) that would confirm everything.
Cams for Ford Windsors come in two flavors, though I have no idea why anyone would ever use an old 302 firing order in a modern engine. No reason to since the 351 firing order is "better" for a few reasons.
Not that the engine won't run and live on the other version, but if just for continuity alone, and less confusion down the road, keeping the 13726548 firing order would have been the best practice.
You just have to remember to orient the plug wires in the other 15426378 order.

Pretty healthy cam too by the way. Would be a real thumper in a 302, but less radical for the larger 351 (more cubes, less sensitivity to duration and lift amounts) and probably a healthy runner once you get it all back up and running.

Couldn't find a cam card, but he had written down that "he believed" this was the cam because of the specs written.

https://www.summitracing.com/parts/crn-363941

The review on the summit page mentions that the cam card was wrong and that he had better luck with the 351 firing order.. ?!
 

DirtDonk

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Nov 3, 2003
Messages
49,244
How did the engine run before? Other than the squealing belt, did it run smooth?
It's easy enough to determine which firing order by the old "finger-over-the-hole" method if it comes to that. But however it ran before, should tell you which way to orient the plug wires.

Paul
 

DirtDonk

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Nov 3, 2003
Messages
49,244
I hate it when a cam manufacturer (or maybe it's just Summit?) does not list the firing order on a Ford cam!
Notice that they don't list the 351/5.8 as an application. Only the smaller engines. This would lead one to believe it's the older firing order then, if it wasn't for the fact that the other chart only shows it for later model engines (after '84)!!!
The exclamation points are there because even Ford changed the old 302 firing order to the 351 firing order after a certain year.
So from sometime in the '80's all the 5.0's and 5.8's used the 137 order.

I think the HO's were the first, with the Speed Density car engines hanging on to the old firing order for a few more years. But eventually they all went that way.

Oh well. Guess nobody cares about all things Ford like we do.

Bottom line for you though, is if it ran good before, leave the plug wires the way they were. If not, try both firing orders.
If not sure, do the finger test. You can even do it now while it's apart if you want.

Paul
 

swmrdrn

New Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2017
Messages
121
I did the engine rebuild and explorer serp upgrade earlier this year. When it came down to the pulley I opted to go with a nice yet affordable balancer from professional products.

http://professional-products.com/ha...y-small-block-ford-28-4-oz-in-harmonic-damper

This nice thing about this balancer is that has 3 sets of timing marks and both the 3 and 4 bolt pulley pattern. This allows for a lot of options for your specific build. I used the nice explorer pully from WH and scored a great deal on a good-looking timing pointer on eBay.

abml21.jpg
 

904Bronco

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Sep 28, 2004
Messages
6,002
Loc.
San Martin, CA
I see a lot has happened on this thread since I stepped away to work on my own Bronco!

To drain the coolant, pull the block drains. Sides of the block, forward on the passenger side and to the rear on the drivers side. (Picture of an example)

Paul talked about Cam timing, it can be installed in the normal position (the dot on the cam gear) or advanced or retarded. Probably the other two marks.

I would consider this important info to know and to get your timing marks back to TDC however they need to be, before proceeding.
 

Attachments

  • Block drain.jpg
    Block drain.jpg
    101.7 KB · Views: 49
OP
OP
G

guidoverduci

Contributor
Sr. Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
731
Loc.
NorCal
I did the engine rebuild and explorer serp upgrade earlier this year. When it came down to the pulley I opted to go with a nice yet affordable balancer from professional products.

http://professional-products.com/ha...y-small-block-ford-28-4-oz-in-harmonic-damper

This nice thing about this balancer is that has 3 sets of timing marks and both the 3 and 4 bolt pulley pattern. This allows for a lot of options for your specific build. I used the nice explorer pully from WH and scored a great deal on a good-looking timing pointer on eBay.

abml21.jpg

Nice! The website says it needs a spacer for later model engines, is this something you dealt with? I’m wondering if this and the WH pulley would be all I needed?
 

swmrdrn

New Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2017
Messages
121
Nice! The website says it needs a spacer for later model engines, is this something you dealt with? I’m wondering if this and the WH pulley would be all I needed?

I did NOT need a spacer. It all bolted up easy and works great. All in the cost is about the same as having damper dudes rebalance the stock explorer unit.
 
OP
OP
G

guidoverduci

Contributor
Sr. Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
731
Loc.
NorCal
I did NOT need a spacer. It all bolted up easy and works great. All in the cost is about the same as having damper dudes rebalance the stock explorer unit.

Thanks. It looks good! I’m just worried I’d need something else to make it fit with a late 80s 351w. I’m leaning towards damper dudes since it’s the same cost, but yours looks sweet!
 

DirtDonk

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Nov 3, 2003
Messages
49,244
I did not read anything about spacers, but it's perhaps referring to the ring adapter that lets one damper fit both types of pulleys. It's just one more variation that Ford threw at us with the front accessory drive systems over the years.

In the pics you can see the nylon aligning ring (like a "hub-centric" thingy) inside the pulley. Ford had dampers with an extended lip that centered the pulleys that had just a hole. Then Ford had a flat damper and the pulley had the centering ring stamped into it.
With the damper being flat-faced, if your pulley has a lip you leave the ring out. If your pulley is also flat, you insert the ring into the damper's bore and then install the pulley.
Our damper comes with a steel ring, but many (most maybe) come with the plastic/nylon one.

I prefer the steel just on principle, but I doubt that the material strength is an issue as long as the installation is correct and the bolts are tight. There is a lot of stress on this component to be sure, but as long as the bolts are tight the centering/aligning ring is not under stress itself.
All the more reason to keep your pulley bolts tight though!

Paul
 
OP
OP
G

guidoverduci

Contributor
Sr. Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
731
Loc.
NorCal
Gotcha. I was referring to the note on the site that said
“All of our small block Ford dampers are made to the early 1963-69 length and require the use of spacers (see page 42 of catalog or call for more information) on '70 and later engines”
 

DirtDonk

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Nov 3, 2003
Messages
49,244
Well that sure sounds like it's talking about an actual spacer to change the depth. They should link you to a proper spacer then, since it's not a common thing that I've seen.
Wonder what one would look like?

Paul
 
Top