• Just a reminder that you won't be able to start new posts or reply to existings posts in the Archive forum.

    This is where all the old posts go so they can still be used for reference and searched.
  • Welcome to ClassicBroncos! - You are currently viewing the forums as a GUEST. To take advantage of all the site features, please take a moment to register. It's fast, simple and absolutely free. So please join our community today!
    If you have problems registering or can't log into your account, please contact Admin.

What killed the Cleveland?

Viperwolf1

Contributor
electron whisperer
Joined
Aug 23, 2007
Messages
24,344
I don't think it was any one thing that killed it. It was a series of unfortunate events. High performance engines were on there way out due to insurance rates (lack of sales), upcoming CAFE & EPA requirements, and Ford's pullout from racing. CAFE standards were brought about by the Arab oil embargo of 1973. More weight in a car meant it got worse mileage. The Clevelands were heavier than the Windors and more expensive to manufacture. You also had the influx of high quality imported cars that got good gas mileage. Ford had to do something to regain the sales they were losing. Their answer was to streamline engine production and to ramp up production of the car of the future:
 

Attachments

  • Ford_Pinto.jpg
    Ford_Pinto.jpg
    69.8 KB · Views: 39

mustangtoby

Bronco Guru
Joined
Nov 28, 2007
Messages
1,757
Loc.
southwest Colorado
I don't think it was any one thing that killed it. It was a series of unfortunate events. High performance engines were on there way out due to insurance rates (lack of sales), upcoming CAFE & EPA requirements, and Ford's pullout from racing. CAFE standards were brought about by the Arab oil embargo of 1973. More weight in a car meant it got worse mileage. The Clevelands were heavier than the Windors and more expensive to manufacture. You also had the influx of high quality imported cars that got good gas mileage. Ford had to do something to regain the sales they were losing. Their answer was to streamline engine production and to ramp up production of the car of the future:

Ah... You said it better than anybody else!
 

turbotim2

____________
Joined
Jun 26, 2003
Messages
1,965
Lets not forget the Cleveland's reliability problems...

The 351M and 400 were mostly the same block which were designed to fix the C's issues.

Sweet Pinto photo... That brings me back to my first car... and beautiful seafoam green 78 Pinto.
 

bmc69

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Jun 11, 2004
Messages
11,914
Lets not forget the Cleveland's reliability problems...

The 351M and 400 were mostly the same block which were designed to fix the C's issues.

.

?? Please expand on that sttement. I'm not aware of any known 'C issues' that were designed out when the 400 was designed other than the increased crank journal size to support the higher torque. And the 351m and 400 blocks are not 'mostly the same'..they are identical in every respect..there was only one block produced for both flavors..the 400 block. The only significant design change the 400 block ever received was some beefing up of the #3 main webs when Ford decided the engine would become their standard platform for truck use..meaning there would be a lot more manual tranny applications and thus more axial loads on the #3 bearing. This design chnge resulted in the the "D7T" block casting designation.
 

ep67bro

Contributor
Bronco Junky
Joined
Aug 28, 2008
Messages
3,766
Loc.
Easton, MD
WOW I thought the cut or uncut bronoc topic was bad! Guess it has nothing on this!! I can feel the tension thru the keyboard!!
 
OP
OP
justinoshea

justinoshea

Contributor
Full Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2007
Messages
479
Loc.
Gilbert, AZ
WOW I thought the cut or uncut bronoc topic was bad! Guess it has nothing on this!! I can feel the tension thru the keyboard!!

that why it's limited to once a month. funny thing is, most people upgraded with aftermarket parts, and the two could be built to have an idential power curves.

who do the Clevlor guys side with?
 

bmc69

Contributor
Bronco Guru
Joined
Jun 11, 2004
Messages
11,914
WOW I thought the cut or uncut bronoc topic was bad! Guess it has nothing on this!! I can feel the tension thru the keyboard!!

Huh? heck, I thought this thred was probably more like listening to a lecture on the macroeconomics of Australian pygmies in the 18th centry. I think all if the tension and suspense is in the chat section and something to do with wondering when 4x4BG's next photo shoot is going to get posted up.;D
 

Madgyver

Contributor
Bronco Madman
Joined
Jul 30, 2001
Messages
14,903
who do the Clevor guys side with?
I'll do both, correction, all 3
Got to have at least 1..
I have more 351C4V motors than I do "W"s.
I have more 4V quench heads than I do open chamber heads.
 
Top